Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;75(3):576-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.12.012.

Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database

Jason E Williams  1 , Jennifer L Holub, Douglas O Faigel
Affiliations

Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database

Jason E Williams et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is one of the main quality measures for colonoscopy, but it is burdensome to calculate and is not amenable to claims-based reporting.

Objective: To validate the correlation between polypectomy rates (PRs) and ADRs by using a large group of endoscopists.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Community and academic endoscopy units in the United States.

Subjects: Sixty endoscopists and their patients.

Main outcome measurements: Proportion of patients with any adenoma and any polyp removed; correlation between ADRs and PRs.

Results: In total, 14,341 screening colonoscopies were included, and there was high correlation between endoscopists' PRs and ADRs in men ( r(s)= .91, P < .0001) and women (r(s) = .91, P < .0001). Endoscopists with PRs in the highest quartile had a significantly higher ADR than did those in the lowest quartile in men (44.6% vs 19.4%, P < .0001) and women (33.6% vs 11.6%, P < .0001). Endoscopists in the top polypectomy quartile also found more advanced adenomas than did endoscopists in the bottom quartile (men: 9.6% vs 4.6%, P = .0006; women: 6.3% vs 3.0%, P = .01). Benchmark PRs of 40% and 30% correlated with ADRs greater than 25% and 15% for men and women, respectively.

Limitation: Retrospective analysis of a subset of a national endoscopic database.

Conclusions: Endoscopists' PRs correlate well with their ADRs. Given its clinical relevance, its simplicity, and the ease with which it can be incorporated into claims-based reporting programs, the PR may become an important quality measure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polypectomy rate (PR) in men, among study endoscopists. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rs) demonstrates a good correlation between ADR and PR.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and polypectomy rate (PR) in women, among study endoscopists.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2010;116:544–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–41. - PubMed
    1. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24–8. - PubMed
    1. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:856–61. - PubMed
    1. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:352–9. - PubMed

Publication types