Primary endpoint results of the EVOLVE trial: a randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent
- PMID: 22341736
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.016
Primary endpoint results of the EVOLVE trial: a randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 dose formulations of SYNERGY, a novel bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) compared with the durable polymer PROMUS Element EES (Boston Scientific Corp.).
Background: Durable polymer coatings on drug-eluting stents have been associated with chronic inflammation and impaired healing. Bioabsorbable polymer-coated drug-delivery systems may reduce the risk of late adverse events, including stent thrombosis, and thus the need for prolonged dual-antiplatelet therapy.
Methods: A total of 291 patients with a de novo lesion ≤28 mm in length, in a coronary artery of ≥2.25 to ≤3.5 mm diameter, were enrolled in the EVOLVE study, a prospective, randomized, single-blind, noninferiority trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to PROMUS Element, SYNERGY, or SYNERGY half dose. The primary clinical endpoint was the 30-day rate of target lesion failure, defined as cardiac death or myocardial infarction related to the target vessel, or target lesion revascularization. The primary angiographic endpoint was 6-month in-stent late loss measured by quantitative coronary angiography.
Results: The 30-day primary clinical endpoint of target lesion failure occurred in 0%, 1.1%, and 3.1% of patients in the PROMUS Element, SYNERGY, and SYNERGY half dose groups, respectively. The 6-month in-stent late loss was 0.15 ± 0.34 mm for PROMUS Element, 0.10 ± 0.25 mm for SYNERGY, and 0.13 ± 0.26 mm for SYNERGY half dose (SYNERGY, difference -0.06, upper 95.2% confidence limit: 0.02, p for noninferiority <0.001; SYNERGY half dose, difference -0.03, upper 95.2% confidence limit: 0.05, p for noninferiority <0.001). Clinical event rates remained low and comparable between groups, with no stent thromboses in any group at 6 months.
Conclusions: The EVOLVE trial confirms the effective delivery of everolimus by a unique directional bioabsorbable polymer system utilizing the SYNERGY stent. (A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Single-Blind Noninferiority Trial to Assess the Safety and Performance of the Evolution Everolimus-Eluting Monorail Coronary Stent System [Evolution Stent System] for the Treatment of a De Novo Atherosclerotic Lesion [EVOLVE]; NCT01135225).
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
A multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus- with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 25. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22284328 Clinical Trial.
-
A randomized controlled trial in second-generation zotarolimus-eluting Resolute stents versus everolimus-eluting Xience V stents in real-world patients: the TWENTE trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1350-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Feb 15. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 22341737 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent: the EVOLVE II Randomized Trial.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr;8(4):e002372. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002372. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 25855680 Clinical Trial.
-
Coating bioabsorption and chronic bare metal scaffolding versus fully bioabsorbable stent.EuroIntervention. 2009 Dec 15;5 Suppl F:F36-42. doi: 10.4244/EIJV5IFA6. EuroIntervention. 2009. PMID: 22100674 Review.
-
Comparison of 3 biodegradable polymer and durable polymer-based drug-eluting stents in all-comers (BIO-RESORT): rationale and study design of the randomized TWENTE III multicenter trial.Am Heart J. 2014 Apr;167(4):445-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.11.014. Epub 2014 Jan 6. Am Heart J. 2014. PMID: 24655691 Review.
Cited by
-
Critical evaluation of stents in coronary angioplasty: a systematic review.Biomed Eng Online. 2021 May 8;20(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12938-021-00883-7. Biomed Eng Online. 2021. PMID: 33964954 Free PMC article.
-
Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology).Heart Vessels. 2020 Apr;35(4):463-473. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01516-9. Epub 2019 Oct 5. Heart Vessels. 2020. PMID: 31587103 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents.N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 4;371(23):2155-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1409312. Epub 2014 Nov 16. N Engl J Med. 2014. PMID: 25399658 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Long-Term (5-Years) Outcomes of Current Drug-Eluting Stents in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Aug;106(2):1196-1211. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31668. Epub 2025 Jun 5. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. PMID: 40470578 Free PMC article.
-
Highlights of the year in JACC 2012.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 22;61(3):357-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.002. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23328613 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical