Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Sep 28;383(1-2):47-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

Immunologic, spectrophotometric and nucleic acid based methods for the detection and quantification of airborne pollen

Affiliations
Review

Immunologic, spectrophotometric and nucleic acid based methods for the detection and quantification of airborne pollen

William R Rittenour et al. J Immunol Methods. .

Abstract

Microscopic identification of pollen morphological phenotypes has been the traditional method used to identify and quantify pollen collected by air monitoring stations worldwide. Although this method has enabled a semi-standardized approach for the assessment of pollen exposure, limitations including labor intensiveness, required expertise, examiner bias, and the inability to differentiate species, genera, and in some cases families have limited data derived from the these stations. Recent advances in chemical, biochemical and molecular detection methods have provided standardized alternatives to this microscopic approach. In this review, we examine the applicability of alternative methodologies, in particular nucleic acid based assays involving the quantitative polymerase chain reaction, for the standardized detection of airborne pollen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart describing the steps that must be taken during preliminary experimentation. Dotted arrows and italicized text represent possible limitations that may arise. Limitations may be overcome by revisiting the previous step and optimizing the conditions.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of qPCR quantification of pollen. The figure indicates the estimated time required for each step.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arbes SJ, Gergen PJ, Elliott L, Zeldin DC. Prevalences of positive skin test responses to 10 common allergens in the US population: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2005;116:377. - PubMed
    1. Blachere FM, Lindsley WG, Slaven JE, Green BJ, Anderson SE, Chen BT, Beezhold DH. Bioaerosol sampling for the detection of aersolized influenza virus. Influenza Other Respi. Viruses. 2007;1:113–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boucher A, Hidalgo PJ, Thonnat M, Belmonte J, Galan C, Bonton P, Tomczak R. Development of a semi-automatic system for pollen recognition. Aerobiologia. 2002;18:195.
    1. Dell'Anna R, Lazzeri P, Frisanco M, Monti F, Malvezzi Campeggi F, Gottardini E, Bersani M. Pollen discrimination and classification by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) microspectroscopy and machine learning. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009;394:1443. - PubMed
    1. Dutil S, Veillette M, Mériaux A, Lazure L, Barbeau J, Duchaine C. Aerosolization of mycobacteria and legionellae during dental treatment: low exposure despite dental unit contamination. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;9:2836. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources