PSA screening: determinants of primary-care physician practice patterns
- PMID: 22343837
- DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2011.59
PSA screening: determinants of primary-care physician practice patterns
Erratum in
- Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2012 Jun;15(2):211
Abstract
Background: The effect of practice guidelines and the European Randomised Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) trials on PSA screening practices of primary-care physicians (PCPs) is unknown.
Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional on-line survey of a random sample of 3010 PCPs from July to August 2010. Participants were queried about their knowledge of prostate cancer, PSA screening guidelines, the ERSPC and PLCO trials, and about their PSA screening practices. Factors associated with PSA screening were identified using multivariable linear regression.
Results: A total of 152 (5%) participants opened and 89 completed the on-line survey, yielding a response rate of 58% for those that viewed the invitation. Eighty percent of respondents correctly identified prostate cancer risk factors. In all, 51% and 64% reported that they discuss and order PSA screening for men aged 50-75 years, respectively. Fifty-four percent were most influenced by the US Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. Also, 21% and 28% of respondents stated that their PSA screening practices were influenced by the ERSPC and PLCO trials, respectively. Medical specialty was the only variable associated with propensity to screen, with family medicine physicians more likely to use PSA screening than internists (β=0.21, P=0.02).
Conclusions: Half of the physicians surveyed did not routinely discuss PSA screening with eligible patients. The impact of the ERSPC and PLCO trials on PSA screening practices was low among US PCPs. USPSTF recommendations for PSA screening continue to be the strongest influence on PCPs' propensity to use PSA screening.
Similar articles
-
Prostate specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: knowledge of, attitudes towards, and utilization among primary care physicians.Urol Oncol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.12.019. Epub 2010 Aug 25. Urol Oncol. 2012. PMID: 20800514
-
Primary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan;32(1):41.e23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Aug 2. Urol Oncol. 2014. PMID: 23911680
-
Prostate-specific antigen testing in Ontario: reasons for testing patients without diagnosed prostate cancer.CMAJ. 1999 Jan 12;160(1):70-5. CMAJ. 1999. PMID: 9934349 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversy.Can J Urol. 2011 Oct;18(5):5875-83. Can J Urol. 2011. PMID: 22018148 Review.
-
Prostate-specific antigen tests and prostate cancer screening: an update for primary care physicians.Can J Urol. 2010 Feb;17 Suppl 1:18-25. Can J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20170597 Review.
Cited by
-
[Rates of prostate-specific antigen testing for early detection of prostate cancer: a first comparison of German results with current international data].Urologe A. 2014 May;53(5):715-24. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3453-0. Urologe A. 2014. PMID: 24700162 German.
-
The effect of the USPSTF PSA screening recommendation on prostate cancer incidence patterns in the USA.Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Jan;14(1):26-37. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.251. Epub 2016 Dec 20. Nat Rev Urol. 2017. PMID: 27995937 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Urologists' and general practitioners' knowledge, beliefs and practice relevant for opportunistic prostate cancer screening: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 16;11:1283654. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1283654. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 38435387 Free PMC article.
-
Primary Care Providers' Intended Use of Decision Aids for Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing for Prostate Cancer Screening.J Cancer Educ. 2019 Aug;34(4):666-670. doi: 10.1007/s13187-018-1353-5. J Cancer Educ. 2019. PMID: 29582364 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of the US Preventive Services Task Force Grade D Recommendation: Assessment of Evaluations for Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and Prostate Biopsies in a Large Urology Group Practice Following Statement Revision.Rev Urol. 2015;17(3):171-7. Rev Urol. 2015. PMID: 26543432 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous