Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;21(2):274-80.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050418.

Tobacco control, global health policy and development: towards policy coherence in global governance

Affiliations

Tobacco control, global health policy and development: towards policy coherence in global governance

Jeff Collin. Tob Control. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

The WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) demonstrates the international political will invested in combating the tobacco pandemic and a newfound prominence for tobacco control within the global health agenda. However, major difficulties exist in managing conflicts with foreign and trade policy priorities, and significant obstacles confront efforts to create synergies with development policy and avoid tensions with other health priorities. This paper uses the concept of policy coherence to explore congruence and inconsistencies in objectives, policy, and practice between tobacco control and trade, development and global health priorities. Following the inability of the FCTC negotiations to satisfactorily address the relationship between trade and health, several disputes highlight the challenges posed to tobacco control policies by multilateral and bilateral agreements. While the work of the World Bank has demonstrated the potential contribution of tobacco control to development, the absence of non-communicable diseases from the Millennium Development Goals has limited scope to offer developing countries support for FCTC implementation. Even within international health, tobacco control priorities may be hard to reconcile with other agendas. The paper concludes by discussing the extent to which tobacco control has been pursued via a model of governance very deliberately different from those used in other health issues, in what can be termed 'tobacco exceptionalism'. The analysis developed here suggests that non-communicable disease (NCD) policies, global health, development and tobacco control would have much to gain from re-examining this presumption of difference.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organization. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO Press; 2003. [accessed 5 May 2011]. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2003/9241591013.pdf.
    1. Collin J, Lee K. Globalization and the politics of health governance: the framework convention on tobacco control. In: Cooper A, Kirton J, editors. Innovation in Global Health Governance: Critical Cases. Farnham, Surrey: Avebury Press; 2009. pp. 219–41.
    1. Brown T, Cueto M, Fee E. The world health organization and the Transition from international to global public health. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:62–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Table 5: Links Between Strategic Objectives 2008-2009 and Areas of Work 2006-2007. [accessed 5 May 2011]; WHO Programme Budget 2008-09 Financial Tables. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/AMTSP-PPB/a-mtsp_7en.pdf.
    1. WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. [accessed 5 May 2011]. Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action On The Social Determinants of Health Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2008/9789241563703_eng.pdf.

Publication types