Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Sep;17(3):197-201.
doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.92336.

Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Doctors in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India: A Cross Sectional study

Affiliations

Attitudes Toward Euthanasia Among Doctors in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India: A Cross Sectional study

Sneha Kamath et al. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 Sep.

Abstract

Context: Advances in expertise and equipment have enabled the medical profession to exercise more control over the processes of life and death, creating a number of moral and ethical dilemmas. People may live for extended periods with chronic painful or debilitating conditions that may be incurable.

Aim: This study attempts to study the attitudes of doctors toward euthanasia and the possible factors responsible for these attitudes.

Settings and design: A cross-sectional survey of 213 doctors working at a tertiary care hospital was conducted to determine their attitudes toward euthanasia.

Materials and methods: A self-administered questionnaire was used to assess attitudes and personal perceptions about euthanasia.

Statistical analysis used: The Chi square test was used to assess factors influencing attitudes toward euthanasia.

Results: A majority of the respondents (69.3%) supported the concept of euthanasia. Relief from unbearable pain and suffering was the most commonly (80.3%) cited reason for being willing to consider the option of euthanasia. Majority of those who were against euthanasia (66.2%) felt that the freedom to perform euthanasia could easily be misused. Disapproval of euthanasia was associated with religious affiliation (P<0.001) and speciality (P<0.001).

Conclusions: A majority of the doctors in this study supported euthanasia for the relief of unbearable pain and suffering. Religion and speciality appear to be significant in determining attitudes toward euthanasia.

Keywords: Attitudes; Doctors; Euthanasia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Definition of euthanasia. [Last accessed on 2010 Nov 25]. Available from: http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O999-euthanasia.html.
    1. Materstvedt LJ, Clark D, Ellershaw J, Førde R, Gravgaard AM, Müller-Busch HC, et al. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: Aview from an EAPC Ethics Task Force. Palliat Med. 2003;17:97–101. - PubMed
    1. Garrard E, Wilkinson S. Passive euthanasia. J Med Ethics. 2005;31:64–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Broeckaert B. Treatment decisions in advanced disease: A conceptual framework. Indian J Palliat Care. 2009;15:30–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neil DA, Coady CA, Thompson J, Kuhse H. End-of-life decisions in medical practice: A survey of doctors in Victoria (Australia) J Med Ethics. 2007;33:721–5. - PMC - PubMed