A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of bisphosphonates in the management of painful bone metastasis
- PMID: 22346045
- PMCID: PMC3276818
- DOI: 10.4103/0973-1075.92338
A randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of bisphosphonates in the management of painful bone metastasis
Abstract
Introduction: The prospective interventional single-institution randomized control study was carried out to compare the pain relieving efficacy among different bisphosphonates at the cost of incidence of skeletal-related events (SRE).
Materials and methods: During June 2008 and May 2011, 256 patients with painful bone metastasis in solid tumors with a pain score of at least 5 were randomized into three arms: zoledronic acid (4 mg, i.v.), ibandronate (6 mg, i.v.) and pamidronate (90 mg, i.v.). Radiation was given to all patients, either 800 cGy single fraction or 20 Gy in five fractions. The ANOVA test was used for analysis. The Pearson test was used to correlate pain scores with proportions of responders as statistical estimation of pain relief.
Results: With a mean baseline pain score of 6.5 ± 1.2, there was no difference in pain scores among the three treatment arms, assessed at 3 months and at the end of the study. However, the pain scores at 6 months were statistically reduced in zoledronic acid-receiving patients (1.5 ± 0.4) unlike the scores in patients receiving ibandronate (3.1 ± 0.5) and pamidronate (2.3 ± 0.4), with a P-value of 0.024. The response was statistically significant at 6 months (0.039) and at the end of the study (0.023), in favor of zoledronic acid. Pearson's correlation demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation between pain scores and response rates. There were no statistical differences in the narcotic scores among the treatment arms during the study period. The overall duration of pain relief was not different in any of treatment arms. The time of detection of hypercalcemia was no different; however, the incidence of hypercalcemia was significantly less in the zoledronic acid arm (28.3%) against 44.6% and 50% in ibandronate and pamidronate arms, respectively, with a P-value of 0.041.
Conclusion: The use of bisphosphonates for 6 months or more results in a statistical significant improvement in bone pain, more so with zoledronic acid. Hypercalcemia, an SRE, was significantly less in the zoledronic acid arm.
Keywords: Bisphosphonates; Ibandronate; Painful bone metastasis; Pamidronate; Skeletal-related events; Zoledronic acid.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures





Similar articles
-
Which Bone-Modifying Agent is Associated with Better Outcomes in Patients with Skeletal Metastases from Lung Cancer? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Sep 1;479(9):2047-2057. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001749. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021. PMID: 33835092 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate compared with intravenous (i.v.) zoledronic acid or i.v. generic pamidronate in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease undergoing i.v. chemotherapy.Support Care Cancer. 2005 Dec;13(12):975-86. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0828-1. Epub 2005 May 4. Support Care Cancer. 2005. PMID: 15871033
-
Comparative evaluation of safety and efficacy of pamidronate and zoledronic acid in multiple myeloma patients (single center experience).Acta Pol Pharm. 2002 Nov-Dec;59(6):478-82. Acta Pol Pharm. 2002. PMID: 12669777 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness of oral ibandronate versus IV zoledronic acid or IV pamidronate for bone metastases in patients receiving oral hormonal therapy for breast cancer in the United Kingdom.Clin Ther. 2005 Aug;27(8):1295-310. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.08.006. Clin Ther. 2005. PMID: 16199254
-
Bisphosphonates: clinical experience.Oncologist. 2004;9 Suppl 4:14-27. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-90004-14. Oncologist. 2004. PMID: 15459426 Review.
Cited by
-
Ibandronate to treat skeletal-related events and bone pain in metastatic bone disease or multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 2;5(6):e007258. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007258. BMJ Open. 2015. PMID: 26038356 Free PMC article.
-
Denosumab versus bisphosphonates for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors: a systematic review.Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(4):487-499. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1011-1. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Eur J Health Econ. 2019. PMID: 30382484
-
An Exploratory Analysis of Levels of Evidence for Articles Published in Indian Journal of Palliative Care in the years 2010-2011.Indian J Palliat Care. 2013 Sep;19(3):170-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.121535. Indian J Palliat Care. 2013. PMID: 24347908 Free PMC article.
-
Management of bone metastasis with zoledronic acid: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.J Bone Oncol. 2023 Feb 9;39:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100470. eCollection 2023 Apr. J Bone Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36860585 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and Safety of Zoledronic Acid and Pamidronate Disodium in the Treatment of Malignant Skeletal Metastasis: A Meta-Analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1822. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001822. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 26496320 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Saad F, Gleason DM, Murray R, Tchekmedyian S, Venner P, Lacombe L, et al. Long-term efficacy of Zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:879–82. - PubMed
-
- Farrar JT. What is clinically meaningful: Outcome measures in pain clinical trials. Clin J Pain. 2000;16:106–12. - PubMed
-
- Hanks G. The crisis in health care cost in the United States: Some implications for radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23:203–6. - PubMed
-
- Nielsen OS, Munro AJ, Tannock IF. Bone metastases: Pathophysiology and management policy. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:509–24. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources