Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jan;4(1):1-5.
doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.91611.

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: Review of the world literature

Affiliations

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: Review of the world literature

Wassim M Bazzi et al. Urol Ann. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has gained momentum in the recent urologic literature as a new surgical approach for intra-abdominal organs with scarless and painless postoperative recoveries. We sought to review the published literature concerning the safety and reproducibility of NOTES in urology. PubMed literature review of articles published in the English language was performed over a 10-year period, i.e., between 2001 and 2011; all articles were critically reviewed and analyzed. Despite its novelty, pure or hybrid surgical approaches have been adapted in performing NOTES. NOTES essentially utilizes transluminal flexible endoscopic instruments along with laparoscopic instruments to gain access to abdominal, pelvic, and/or retroperitoneal cavities. The preliminary results of NOTES in surgery and to a limited extent in urology appear promising, yet further research in animal survival and human cadaveric models is requisite prior to human applications, especially for complex surgeries. Future innovative research, particularly biomedical engineering, should be directed to improving the technicality and mechanistic application of NOTES; hence, better safety and efficacy of NOTES.

Keywords: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery; urology; world literature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flexible endoscope utilized in NOTES procedure (right image) and laparoscopic view of endoscope with snare (left image)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Creating submucosal rectal tunnel (right image) and surgical approach with transrectal trocar (left image)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative laparoscopic view of dissecting forceps during NOTES procedure
Figure 4
Figure 4
Rectal extraction of specimen (right image) and rectotomy closure (left image)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Merety KS, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1370–1. - PubMed
    1. Gill IS, Desai MM, Kaouk JH, Meraney AM, Murphy DP, Sung GT, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: Duplicating open surgical techniques. J Urol. 2002;167:469–7. - PubMed
    1. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate. 1999;39:71–5. - PubMed
    1. Gillion N, Xylinas E, Durand X, Ploussard G, Vordos D, Allory Y, et al. Mid-term oncological control after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in men: A single-centre experience. BJU Int 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10054.x. - PubMed
    1. Sotelo R, de Andrade R, Fernández G, Ramirez D, Di Grazia E, Carmona O, et al. NOTES hybrid transvaginal radical nephrectomy for tumor: Stepwise progression toward a first successful clinical case. Eur Urol. 2010;57:138–44. - PubMed