Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 Sep;25(9):1791-5.
doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.663833. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

Measurement of gastric-to-end-tidal carbon dioxide difference in neonates requiring intensive care

Orsolya Szakál  1 , Agnes Király, Dániel Szűcs, Márta Katona, Domokos Boda, Gyula Tálosi
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Measurement of gastric-to-end-tidal carbon dioxide difference in neonates requiring intensive care

Orsolya Szakál et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: Gastric-arterial partial CO(2) pressure gap (P(g-)(a)CO(2) gap) measured by gastric tonometry may detect the disturbance of splanchnic perfusion. As in the neonatal age it is very difficult to follow up the circulatory condition with frequent acid-base examinations, we wanted to compare the P(g-)(a)CO(2) gap with an alternative gap of P(g)CO(2) - end-tidal carbon dioxide (P(g)(-)(ET)CO(2) gap).

Methods: A prospective study was performed on ventilated neonates requiring intensive therapy (n = 44, weight: 1813 ± 977 g). P(ET)CO(2) and P(g)CO(2) were measured with a side stream capnograph. We applied a newly developed gastric tonometric probe. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 of patients in stable condition (n = 35) and Group 2 of patients with severe condition (i.e. Clinical Risk Index for Babies [CRIB] score higher than 10; n = 9). For main statistical analysis a mixed model repeated measurements ANOVA, Bland-Altman analysis were applied.

Results: P(g)(-)(ET)CO(2) gap was higher than P(g-)(a)CO(2) gap (11.40 ± 7.79 versus 3.63 ± 7.98 mmHg, p < 0.01). Both gaps were higher in Group 2 (8.71 ± 10.89 and 18.27 ± 10.49 versus 2.53 ± 6.78 and 9.92 ± 6.22 mmHg, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis of the two gaps showed an acceptable correspondence.

Conclusions: P(g)(-)(ET)CO(2) gap may be used as a method for continuous estimation of splanchnic perfusion and a prognostic index also in critically ill neonates. However, the P(g-)(a)CO(2) gap should not be abandoned.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types