High costs and burden of illness in acute rhinosinusitis: real-life treatment patterns and outcomes in Swedish primary care
- PMID: 22349918
- PMCID: PMC6548015
- DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00011
High costs and burden of illness in acute rhinosinusitis: real-life treatment patterns and outcomes in Swedish primary care
Abstract
Background: Few studies have investigated the impact of acute rhinosinusitis on disease-specific quality of life, and disease costs have not been studied previously in Scandinavia.
Aims: To study symptoms, treatment patterns, quality of life and costs in adults with acute rhinosinusitis.
Methods: This was an observational study in primary care. Patients aged 18-80 years seeking care for acute rhinosinusitis were evaluated using the Major Symptom Score (MSS) on days 0 and 15. Recommended and used treatments, quality of life and costs were assessed by questionnaires including EQ-5D™ and a visual analogue scale (VAS) on the same days.
Results: 150 patients were enrolled; 143 provided follow-up data. The proportion of MSS responders was 91%. Mean MSS decreased from 8.4 on day 0 (N = 150) to 1.9 on day 15 (N = 143). Patients reporting pain/discomfort and problems with usual activities decreased from 88.4% to 31.5% and from 43.2% to 1.4%, respectively, and mean VAS increased from 58.7 to 79.5. Intranasal corticosteroids were the most recommended and/or prescribed drugs. Total cost for an episode was 10,260 SEK (€1,102), of which 75% were indirect costs.
Conclusions: With treatment dominated by intranasal corticosteroids, a high proportion of responders and good symptom relief were seen. Acute rhinosinusitis seems to cause a high burden on quality of life and also a high cost for society.
Conflict of interest statement
BS and P Odebäck have received honoraria for educational activities from MSD, GSK and AstraZeneca. PS has received grants for studies and honoraria for educational activities from MSD, GSK, AstraZeneca and Novartis. P Olsson was employed by MSD during the conduct of the study and is currently employed by Boehringer-Ingelheim. JL is an employee of MSD and owns stock options and shares in Merck & Co. BS is an Associate Editor of the
Figures
Comment in
-
Acute rhinosinusitis--does quality of life explain continued rates of antibiotic overusage?Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Jun;21(2):130-1. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00045. Prim Care Respir J. 2012. PMID: 22596244 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Lindbaek M. Acute sinusitis: guide to selection of antibacterial therapy. Drugs 2004;64(8):805–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00003495-200464080-00002 - PubMed
-
- Slavin RG, Spector SL, Bernstein IL, et al. The diagnosis and management of sinusitis: a practice parameter update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116(6 Suppl):S13–S47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2005.09.048 - PubMed
-
- Sande MA and Gwaltney JM. Acute community-acquired bacterial sinusitis: continuing challenges and current management. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39(Suppl 13):S151–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/421353. - PubMed
-
- Fokkens W, Lund V, Mullol J. European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps. Rhinol Suppl 2007;20:1–136. - PubMed
-
- Thomas M, Yawn BP, Price D, Lund V, Mullol J, Fokkens W. EPOS Primary Care Guidelines: European position paper on the primary care diagnosis and management of rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2007 — a summary. Prim Care Respir J 2008;17(2):79–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.3132/pcrj.2008.00029. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous