Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;21(8):1516-21.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2199-x. Epub 2012 Feb 19.

Analysis of lumbar pedicle morphology in degenerative spines using multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography: what can be the reliable index for optimal pedicle screw diameter?

Affiliations

Analysis of lumbar pedicle morphology in degenerative spines using multiplanar reconstruction computed tomography: what can be the reliable index for optimal pedicle screw diameter?

Takahiro Makino et al. Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The measurement of transverse pedicle width is still recommended for selecting a screw diameter despite being weakly correlated with the minimum pedicle diameter, except in the upper lumbar spine. The purpose of this study was to reveal the difference between the minimum pedicle diameter and conventional transverse or sagittal pedicle width in degenerative lumbar spines.

Methods: A total of 50 patients with degenerative lumbar disorders without spondylolysis or lumbar scoliosis of >10° who preoperatively underwent helical CT scans were included. The DICOM data of the scans were reconstructed by imaging software, and the transverse pedicle width (TPW), sagittal pedicle width (SPW), minimum pedicle diameter (MPD), and the cephalocaudal inclination of the pedicles were measured.

Results: The mean TPW/SPW/MPD values were 5.46/11.89/5.09 mm at L1, 5.76/10.44/5.39 mm at L2, 7.25/10.23/6.52 mm at L3, 9.01/9.36/6.83 mm at L4, and 12.86/8.95/7.36 mm at L5. There were significant differences between the TPW and MPD at L3, L4, and L5 (p < 0.01) and between the SPW and MPD at all levels (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The MPD was significantly smaller than the TPW and SPW at L3, L4, and L5. The actual measurements of the TPW were not appropriate for use as a direct index for the optimal pedicle screw diameter at these levels. Surgeons should be careful in determining pedicle screw diameter based on plain CT scans especially in the lower lumbar spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Measurement methods of morphometric parameters on the planes reconstructed by MPR-CT. a Transverse pedicle width on the axial plane (double-headed arrow). b Sagittal pedicle width on the sagittal plane (double-headed arrow). c This reconstructed oblique coronal plane is perpendicular to the pedicle axis of both the axial and sagittal planes. Minimum pedicle diameter (double-headed arrow) and cephalocaudal inclination (angle α)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The three-dimensional schema of the oblique coronal plane (C) used for the measurement of the minimum pedicle diameter. This oblique coronal plane is perpendicular both to the axial plane including the pedicle axis of the sagittal plane (A) and to the sagittal plane including the axial plane (B)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison between the transverse pedicle width (TPW), sagittal pedicle width (SPW), and minimum pedicle diameter (MPD) at each level. Error bars show standard deviations. **p < 0.0001, *p = 0.0015
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cephalocaudal inclination (CI) at each level. Error bars show standard deviations. Asterisks indicate that the measurement was significantly different from that of the adjacent upper level (p < 0.0001)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Correlations between the minimum pedicle diameter (MPD) and transverse pedicle width (TPW) at L3 (a), L4 (b), and L5 (c) and between the MPD and sagittal pedicle width (SPW) at L5 (d)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bernard TN, Jr, Seibert CE. Pedicle diameter determined by computed tomography. Its relevance to pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992;17:S160–S163. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199206001-00017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chadha M, Balain B, Maini L, Dhaon BK. Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic, lumbar, and S1 vertebrae: an Indian perspective. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:744–749. - PubMed
    1. Krag MH, Weaver DL, Beynnon BD, Haugh LD. Morphometry of the thoracic and lumbar spine related to transpedicular screw placement for surgical spinal fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988;13:27–32. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198801000-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, Rothman SL, Widell EH., Jr Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:367–372. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198904000-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li B, Jiang B, Fu Z, Zhang D, Wang T. Accurate determination of isthmus of lumbar pedicle: a morphometric study using reformatted computed tomographic images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:2438–2444. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144355.50660.65. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms