Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography
- PMID: 22350037
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0688-2
Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare the reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) surface rendering using clinical protocols based on low-dose (35-mAs) spiral CT and cone-beam CT (I-CAT). The absorbed dose levels for radiosensitive organs in the maxillofacial region during exposure in both 3D-CT protocols were also assessed.
Materials and methods: The study population consisted of ten human dry skulls examined with low-dose CT and cone-beam CT. Two independent observers identified 24 cephalometric anatomic landmarks at 13 sites on the 3D-CT surface renderings using both protocols, with each observer repeating the identification 1 month later. A total of 1,920 imaging measurements were performed. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at six sites around the thyroid gland, the submandibular glands, and the eyes in an Alderson phantom to measure the absorbed dose levels.
Results: When comparing low-dose CT and cone-beam CT protocols, the cone-beam CT protocol proved to be significantly more reproducible for four of the 13 anatomical sites. There was no significant difference between the protocols for the other nine anatomical sites. Both low-dose and cone-beam CT protocols were equivalent in dose absorption to the eyes and submandibular glands. However, thyroid glands were more irradiated with low-dose CT.
Conclusions: Cone-beam CT was more reproducible and procured less irradiation to the thyroid gland than low-dose CT.
Clinical relevance: Cone-beam CT should be preferred over low-dose CT for developing three-dimensional bony cephalometric analyses.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008 Jul;37(5):261-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/33343444. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008. PMID: 18606747
-
Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Sep;25(5):1710-3. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000908. J Craniofac Surg. 2014. PMID: 25203572
-
Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Oct;15(5):721-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0440-8. Epub 2010 Jul 17. Clin Oral Investig. 2011. PMID: 20640463
-
Accuracy of conventional versus cone-beam CT-synthesised lateral cephalograms for cephalometric analysis: A systematic review.J Orthod. 2024 Jun;51(2):160-176. doi: 10.1177/14653125231178038. Epub 2023 Jun 21. J Orthod. 2024. PMID: 37340975
-
Accuracy and reliability of automatic three-dimensional cephalometric landmarking.Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;49(10):1367-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Mar 10. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020. PMID: 32169306
Cited by
-
Challenges in measuring angles between craniofacial structures.J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Jun 3;27:e20180380. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0380. J Appl Oral Sci. 2019. PMID: 31166412 Free PMC article.
-
Reproducibility of the sella turcica landmark in three dimensions using a sella turcica-specific reference system.Imaging Sci Dent. 2015 Mar;45(1):15-22. doi: 10.5624/isd.2015.45.1.15. Epub 2015 Mar 13. Imaging Sci Dent. 2015. PMID: 25793179 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo reliability of 3D cephalometric landmark determination on magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1339-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03015-7. Epub 2019 Jul 27. Clin Oral Investig. 2020. PMID: 31352517
-
Reproducibility of three-dimensional posterior cranial base angles using low-dose computed tomography.Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Nov;21(8):2407-2414. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-2036-4. Epub 2016 Dec 21. Clin Oral Investig. 2017. PMID: 28004246
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous