Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;17(1):33-41.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-0945-7.

Regional variation in late preterm births in North Carolina

Affiliations

Regional variation in late preterm births in North Carolina

Sofia R Aliaga et al. Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Late preterm (LPT) neonates (34 0/7th-36 6/7th weeks' gestation) account for 70% of all premature births in the United States. LPT neonates have a higher morbidity and mortality risk than term neonates. LPT birth rates vary across geographic regions. Unwarranted variation is variation in medical care that cannot be explained by sociodemographic or medical risk factors; it represents differences in health system performance, including provider practice variation. The purpose of this study is to identify regional variation in LPT births in North Carolina that cannot be explained by sociodemographic or medical/obstetric risk factors. We searched the NC State Center for Health Statistics linked birth-death certificate database for all singleton term and LPT neonates born between 1999 and 2006. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to control for socio-demographic and medical/obstetric risk factors. The main outcome was the percent of LPT birth in each of the six perinatal regions in North Carolina. We identified 884,304 neonates; 66,218 (7.5%) were LPT. After multivariable logistic regression, regions 2 (7.0%) and 6 (6.6%) had the highest adjusted percent of LPT birth. Analysis of a statewide birth cohort demonstrates regional variation in the incidence of LPT births among NC's perinatal regions after adjustment for sociodemographic and medical risk factors. We speculate that provider practice variation might explain some of the remaining difference. This is an area where policy changes and quality improvement efforts can help reduce variation, and potentially decrease LPT births.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Perinatal Regions in North Carolina
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unadjusted and adjusted* percents of late preterm birth by perinatal region in North Carolina, 1999–2006
Figure 3
Figure 3
Regional Distribution of Late Preterm Births by Birth Hospital in North Carolina, 1999 – 2006

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;58(24):1–85. - PubMed
    1. Raju TN, Higgins RD, Stark AR, et al. Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):1207–14. - PubMed
    1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: Final Data for 2006. National Center for Health Statistics; Hyattsville, MD: 2009. Contract No.: 7. - PubMed
    1. Engle WA, Tomashek KM, Wallman C. “Late-preterm” infants: a population at risk. Pediatrics. 2007;120(6):1390–401. - PubMed
    1. Morse SB, Zheng H, Tang Y, et al. Early school-age outcomes of late preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2009;123(4):e622–9. - PubMed

Publication types