Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jun;27(2):269-76.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-011-0303-2.

Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening

Dana J Lukin et al. J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

Potential barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening include preexisting medical conditions (comorbidities), physician recommendation, psychosocial factors, and screening preparedness. This study's purpose was to investigate the impact of comorbid conditions on CRC screening among African Americans. A stage-matched randomized clinical trial was performed. Asymptomatic African Americans over age 50, with a primary care physician, and eligible for CRC screening were recruited at The Mount Sinai Hospital from 2005 to 2008. One hundred sixty-one patients were assessed for referral for, and completion of, CRC screening, comorbid conditions, "readiness to change," and number of physician visits within the observation period. Data was compared to a pretrial index to predict the likely effect of comorbid conditions on CRC screening. One hundred fifty-nine patients completed the study; 108 (68.9%) were referred for and 34 (21.2%) completed CRC screening. No demographic characteristics were associated with CRC screening completion. CRC screening referrals were similar for all patients, regardless of comorbidities or clinical visits. Comorbidities rated as having extreme influence on CRC screening showed a trend toward lower screening rates. There was a significant increase in screening rates among participants in advanced stages of readiness at enrollment. These data suggest that while comorbidities did not predict colonoscopy completion, they may play a role in concert with other factors. This is the only study to assess the effect of screening colonoscopy in an African American primary care setting. We must continue to explore interventions to narrow the disparate gap in screening and mortality rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ransohoff DF, Sandler RS. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:40–44. - PubMed
    1. Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(4):339–359. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society [Internet] Atlanta: Breast Cancer Facts & Figs 2005–2006. 2005 Available from: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2005BrF.pdf.
    1. U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Trends in screening for colorectal cancer - United States, 1997 and 1998. MMWR. 2001;50(9):167–168. - PubMed
    1. Polite BN, Dignam JJ, Olopade OI. Colorectal cancer model of health disparities: understanding mortality differences in minority populations. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(14):2179–2187. - PubMed

Publication types