Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening
- PMID: 22351374
- PMCID: PMC3778660
- DOI: 10.1007/s13187-011-0303-2
Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening
Abstract
Potential barriers to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening include preexisting medical conditions (comorbidities), physician recommendation, psychosocial factors, and screening preparedness. This study's purpose was to investigate the impact of comorbid conditions on CRC screening among African Americans. A stage-matched randomized clinical trial was performed. Asymptomatic African Americans over age 50, with a primary care physician, and eligible for CRC screening were recruited at The Mount Sinai Hospital from 2005 to 2008. One hundred sixty-one patients were assessed for referral for, and completion of, CRC screening, comorbid conditions, "readiness to change," and number of physician visits within the observation period. Data was compared to a pretrial index to predict the likely effect of comorbid conditions on CRC screening. One hundred fifty-nine patients completed the study; 108 (68.9%) were referred for and 34 (21.2%) completed CRC screening. No demographic characteristics were associated with CRC screening completion. CRC screening referrals were similar for all patients, regardless of comorbidities or clinical visits. Comorbidities rated as having extreme influence on CRC screening showed a trend toward lower screening rates. There was a significant increase in screening rates among participants in advanced stages of readiness at enrollment. These data suggest that while comorbidities did not predict colonoscopy completion, they may play a role in concert with other factors. This is the only study to assess the effect of screening colonoscopy in an African American primary care setting. We must continue to explore interventions to narrow the disparate gap in screening and mortality rates.
Similar articles
-
Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 9;172(7):575-82. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.332. Arch Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22493463 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.Prev Med. 2021 Apr;145:106449. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449. Epub 2021 Feb 4. Prev Med. 2021. PMID: 33549682 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sociocultural and health correlates related to colorectal cancer screening adherence among urban African Americans.Cancer Nurs. 2015 Mar-Apr;38(2):118-24. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000157. Cancer Nurs. 2015. PMID: 24836955 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31860105 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1645-1658. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 30326005 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Integrating men's health and masculinity theories to explain colorectal cancer screening behavior.Am J Mens Health. 2014 Jan;8(1):54-65. doi: 10.1177/1557988313492171. Epub 2013 Jun 27. Am J Mens Health. 2014. PMID: 23813927 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy: Can We Get Our Recommendations to Stick?Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Oct;60(10):2855-6. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3750-5. Dig Dis Sci. 2015. PMID: 26088369 No abstract available.
-
Prevalence and predictors of colorectal cancer screening in the United States: evidence from the HINTS database 2018 to 2020.Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Feb;35(2):335-345. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01795-8. Epub 2023 Sep 22. Cancer Causes Control. 2024. PMID: 37737304
-
Examining Factors Influencing Colorectal Cancer Screening of Rural Nebraskans Using Data from Clinics Participating in an Accountable Care Organization: A Study Protocol.F1000Res. 2015 Jul 22;4:298. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.6782.1. eCollection 2015. F1000Res. 2015. PMID: 26339476 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of comorbid conditions on participation in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme: a cross-sectional study.BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3516-x. BMC Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28784093 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ransohoff DF, Sandler RS. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:40–44. - PubMed
-
- Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(4):339–359. - PubMed
-
- American Cancer Society [Internet] Atlanta: Breast Cancer Facts & Figs 2005–2006. 2005 Available from: http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF2005BrF.pdf.
-
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Trends in screening for colorectal cancer - United States, 1997 and 1998. MMWR. 2001;50(9):167–168. - PubMed
-
- Polite BN, Dignam JJ, Olopade OI. Colorectal cancer model of health disparities: understanding mortality differences in minority populations. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(14):2179–2187. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous