The effect of patch testing on surgical practices and outcomes in orthopedic patients with metal implants
- PMID: 22351785
- DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2011.2561
The effect of patch testing on surgical practices and outcomes in orthopedic patients with metal implants
Abstract
Objective: To determine the effect of patch testing on surgical decision making and outcomes in patients evaluated for suspected metal hypersensitivity related to implants in bones or joints.
Design: Medical chart review.
Setting: Tertiary care academic medical center.
Participants: All patients who had patch testing for allergic contact dermatitis related to orthopedic implants.
Intervention: Patch testing.
Main outcome measures: The surgeon's preoperative choice of metal implant alloy compared with patch testing results and the presence of hypersensitivity complications related to the metal implant on postsurgical follow-up.
Results: Patients with potential metal hypersensitivity from implanted devices (N = 72) were divided into 2 groups depending on timing of their patch testing: preimplantation (n = 31) and postimplantation (n = 41). History of hypersensitivity to metals was a predictor of positive patch test results to metals in both groups. Positive patch test results indicating metal hypersensitivity influenced the decision-making process of the referring surgeon in all preimplantation cases (n = 21). Patients with metal hypersensitivity who received an allergen-free implant had surgical outcomes free of hypersensitivity complications (n = 21). In patients who had positive patch test results to a metal in their implant after implantation, removal of the device led to resolution of associated symptoms (6 of 10 patients).
Conclusions: The findings of this study support a role for patch testing in patients with a clinical history of metal hypersensitivity before prosthetic device implantation. The decision on whether to remove an implanted device after positive patch test results should be made on a case-by-case basis, as decided by the surgeon and patient.
Comment in
-
Practice gap: the role of patch testing in the selection and management of metal device implants.Arch Dermatol. 2012 Jun;148(6):693-4. Arch Dermatol. 2012. PMID: 22896852 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Retrospective evaluation of patch testing before or after metal device implantation.Arch Dermatol. 2008 Aug;144(8):999-1007. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.8.999. Arch Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18711071
-
Hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants - diagnostic algorithm and suggested patch test series for clinical use.Contact Dermatitis. 2012 Jan;66(1):4-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01971.x. Epub 2011 Sep 29. Contact Dermatitis. 2012. PMID: 21957996 Review.
-
Practice gap: the role of patch testing in the selection and management of metal device implants.Arch Dermatol. 2012 Jun;148(6):693-4. Arch Dermatol. 2012. PMID: 22896852 No abstract available.
-
Metal hypersensitivity reactions to implants: opinions and practices of patch testing dermatologists.Dermatitis. 2013 Nov-Dec;24(6):313-20. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e3182a67d90. Dermatitis. 2013. PMID: 24201465
-
DKG statement on the use of metal alloy discs for patch testing in suspected intolerance to metal implants.J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2015 Oct;13(10):1001-4. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12773. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2015. PMID: 26408461 Review.
Cited by
-
Titanium and Other Metal Hypersensitivity Diagnosed by MELISA® Test: Follow-Up Study.Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jun 3;2021:5512091. doi: 10.1155/2021/5512091. eCollection 2021. Biomed Res Int. 2021. PMID: 34124241 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective study concerning the relationship between metal allergy and post-operative pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty.Int Orthop. 2014 Nov;38(11):2231-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2367-1. Epub 2014 Jun 10. Int Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24910214
-
A subdermal source: contact dermatitis.Am J Med. 2015 Jun;128(6):578-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Am J Med. 2015. PMID: 25747191 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
The T Cell Repertoires from Nickel Sensitized Joint Implant Failure Patients.Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Feb 28;22(5):2428. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052428. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 33670995 Free PMC article.
-
Hypersensitivity to Orthopedic Implants: A Review of the Literature.Rheumatol Ther. 2017 Jun;4(1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s40744-017-0062-6. Epub 2017 Mar 31. Rheumatol Ther. 2017. PMID: 28364382 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical