Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;47(4):1603-20.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

Did copayment changes reduce health service utilization among CHIP enrollees? Evidence from Alabama

Bisakha Sen  1 , Justin Blackburn, Michael A Morrisey, Meredith L Kilgore, David J Becker, Cathy Caldwell, Nir Menachemi
Affiliations

Did copayment changes reduce health service utilization among CHIP enrollees? Evidence from Alabama

Bisakha Sen et al. Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To explore whether health care utilization changed among enrollees in Alabama's CHIP program, ALL Kids, following copayment increases at the beginning of fiscal year 2004.

Data sources: Data on all ALL Kids enrollees over 1999-2009 are obtained from claims files and the state's administrative database.

Study design: We use pooled month-level data for all enrollees and conduct covariate-adjusted segmented regression models. Health services considered are inpatient care, emergency department (ED) visits, brand-name prescription drugs, generic prescription drugs, physician office visits and outpatient-services, ambulance services, allergy treatments, and non-preventive dental services. Physician well-visits, preventive dental services, and service use by Native-Americans--which saw no copayment increases--serve as counterfactuals.

Principal findings: There are significant declines in utilization for inpatient care, physician visits, brand-name medications, and ED visits following the copayment increases. By and large, utilization did not decline, or declined only temporarily, for those services and for those enrollees that who not subject to increased copayments.

Conclusions: Copayment increases reduced utilization of many health services among ALL Kids enrollees. Concerns remain regarding the long-term health consequences to low-income children of copayment-induced reductions in health care utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CHIP Health Services Utilization
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) Public Policy Institute. 2008. “Strategies to Increase Generic Drug Utilization and Associated Savings” [accessed on September 30, 2011]. Available at http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/health/i16_generics.pdf.
    1. Artiga S, O'Malley M. Washington, DC: Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured; 2005. “Increasing Premiums and Cost Sharing in Medicaid and SCHIP: Recent State Experiences”. [accessed January 25, 2012]. Available at http://www.kff.org/medicaid/upload/Increasing-Premiums-and-Cost-Sharingi....
    1. Boles M, Dilley J, Maher JE, Boysun MJ, Reid T. “Smoke-Free Law Associated with Higher-Than-Expected Taxable Retail Sales for Bars and Taverns in Washington State”. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2010;7(4):A79. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Busch SH, Barry CL, Vegso SJ, Sindelar JL, Cullen MR. “Effects of a Cost-Sharing Exemption on Use of Preventive Services at One Large Employer”. Health Affairs. 2006;25(6):1529–36. - PubMed
    1. Center for Children and Families (CCF) Georgetown University Health Policy Institute; 2008. “Cost Sharing for Children and Families in Medicaid and SCHIP”. [accessed on September 28, 2011]. Available at http://www.rwjf.org/files/research/3559.cost.sharing.pdf.

Publication types