Use of the mechanical dilator sheath for removal of endocardial leads: a single center experience
- PMID: 22353144
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03329.x
Use of the mechanical dilator sheath for removal of endocardial leads: a single center experience
Abstract
Background: Due to an increasing number of cardiac device implantations, the number of leads that need to be extracted because of infection or lead failure is consistently rising. We present our experience in percutaneous lead removal in a single tertiary center.
Methods: From December 2009 to August 2010, 12 patients underwent percutaneous lead extraction procedure by the Evolution™ mechanical dilator sheath (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, IN, USA) system after failure of manual traction and a locking stylet.
Results: Ages of the patients ranged between 7 and 86 years (mean age was 58 ± 12 years). Mean implantation time was 73 months (range between 12 and 244 months). Ten patients had one lead; only two patients had two leads. Indications for lead removal were: lead endocarditis in five patients, local (pocket) infection in four patients, and lead failure in three patients. All leads were successfully removed by using the device, except one lead which was one of the two leads in a patient with dual chamber pacemaker implanted 10 years ago. In three patients, same venous accesses (sheath of extraction system) were used to implant a new lead after removal of damaged leads without a new venous puncture. In only one patient, significant hematoma was found after the intervention and treated conservatively. No other significant complications were encountered in any patients.
Conclusions: Damaged or infected leads can safely and relatively easily be extracted by using this new percutaneous extraction technique.
©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous extraction of endocardial leads--a single centre experience in 120 patients.Kardiol Pol. 2009 Feb;67(2):149-56; discussion 157-8. Kardiol Pol. 2009. PMID: 19288377 English, Polish.
-
Percutaneous extraction of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads with evolution mechanical dilator sheath: a single-centre experience.Europace. 2011 Apr;13(4):543-7. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq400. Epub 2010 Nov 17. Europace. 2011. PMID: 21084359
-
Lead implant duration does not always predict ease of extraction: extraction sheath may be required at < 1 year.Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Dec;34(12):1615-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03225.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011. PMID: 22017453
-
Extraction of cardiac rhythm devices: indications, techniques and outcomes for the removal of pacemaker and defibrillator leads.Int J Clin Pract. 2010 Jul;64(8):1140-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2010.02338.x. Int J Clin Pract. 2010. PMID: 20642712 Review.
-
Intravascular lead extraction using the excimer laser: pitfalls and tips for success.Semin Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;21(1):54-6. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2007.11.004. Semin Vasc Surg. 2008. PMID: 18342737 Review.
Cited by
-
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Infection in Patients at Risk.Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016 May;5(1):65-71. doi: 10.15420/aer.2015.27.2. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2016. PMID: 27403296 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and mortality of rotating sheaths versus laser sheaths for transvenous lead extraction: a meta-analysis.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Aug;66(5):1067-1075. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-01076-x. Epub 2021 Nov 27. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023. PMID: 34839431 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical