Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Apr;59(4):893-8.
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.189589. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

Differential effects of nebivolol and metoprolol on insulin sensitivity and plasminogen activator inhibitor in the metabolic syndrome

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Differential effects of nebivolol and metoprolol on insulin sensitivity and plasminogen activator inhibitor in the metabolic syndrome

Katie Ayers et al. Hypertension. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Early-generation β-blockers lower blood pressure and reduce cardiovascular morality in coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure but worsen glucose homeostasis and fibrinolytic balance. Nebivolol is a third-generation β-blocker that increases the bioavailability of nitric oxide. We compared the effect of nebivolol (5 mg/d) and the β(1)-selective antagonist metoprolol (100 mg/d) on glucose homeostasis and markers of fibrinolysis in 46 subjects with metabolic syndrome. Subjects underwent a frequently sampled IV glucose tolerance test after 3-week washout and placebo treatment and after randomized treatment with study drug. After 12-week treatment, nebivolol and metoprolol equivalently decreased systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate. Neither drug affected β-cell function, disposition index, or acute insulin response to glucose. Metoprolol significantly decreased the insulin sensitivity index. In contrast, nebivolol did not affect insulin sensitivity, and the decrease in sensitivity was significantly greater after metoprolol than after nebivolol (-1.5±2.5×10(-4)×min(-1) per milliunit per liter versus 0.04±2.19×10(-4)×min(-1) per milliunit per liter after nebivolol; P=0.03). Circulating plasminogen activator inhibitor also increased after treatment with metoprolol (from 9.8±6.8 to 12.3±7.8 ng/mL) but not nebivolol (from 10.8±7.8 to 10.5±6.2 ng/mL; P=0.05 versus metoprolol). Metoprolol, but not nebivolol, increased F(2)-isoprostane concentrations. In summary, treatment with metoprolol decreased insulin sensitivity and increased oxidative stress and the antifibrinolytic plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 in patients with metabolic syndrome, whereas nebivolol lacked detrimental metabolic effects. Large clinical trials are needed to compare effects of nebivolol and the β(1) receptor antagonist metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with hypertension and the metabolic syndrome.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00775671.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Protocol. Upper figure shows overall study protocol. Lower protocol shows protocol for frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test performed on each study day.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of metoprolol and nebivolol on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR). Changes are shown as both absolute change (Δ) and percent change (%Δ) compared to baseline.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of metoprolol and nebivolol on plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). *P<0.05 versus pretreatment, †P=0.05 versus the metoprolol treatment group, after controlling for race and baseline PAI-1 antigen.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Effect of carvedilol versus nebivolol on insulin resistance among non-diabetic, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with heart failure.
    Metwally YG, Sedrak HK, Shaltout IF. Metwally YG, et al. Egypt Heart J. 2020 Sep 29;72(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s43044-020-00099-5. Egypt Heart J. 2020. PMID: 32990863 Free PMC article.
  • Fenofibrate lowers blood pressure in salt-sensitive but not salt-resistant hypertension.
    Gilbert K, Nian H, Yu C, Luther JM, Brown NJ. Gilbert K, et al. J Hypertens. 2013 Apr;31(4):820-9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835e8227. J Hypertens. 2013. PMID: 23385647 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
  • [Austrian Consensus on High Blood Pressure 2019].
    Weber T, Arbeiter K, Ardelt F, Auer J, Aufricht C, Brandt MC, Dichtl W, Ferrari J, Föger B, Henkel M, Hohenstein-Scheibenecker K, Horn S, Kautzky-Willer A, Kepplinger E, Knoflach M, Koppelstätter C, Mache C, Marschang P, Mayer G, Metzler B, Oberbauer R, Obermair F, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Perl S, Pilz S, Prischl FC, Podczeck-Schweighofer A, Rebhandl E, Rohla M, Roller-Wirnsberger R, Saely CH, Siostrzonek P, Slany J, Stoschitzky K, Waldegger S, Wenzel RR, Weiss T, Wirnsberger G, Winhofer-Stöckl Y, Zweiker D, Zweiker R, Watschinger B; Österreichische Gesellschaft für Hypertensiologie; Österreichische Atherosklerosegesellschaft; Österreichische Diabetes Gesellschaft; Österreichische Gesellschaft für Internistische Angiologie; Österreichische Gesellschaft für Nephrologie; Österreichische Kardiologische Gesellschaft; Österreichische Gesellschaft für Neurologie; Österreichische Schlaganfall-Gesellschaft; Österr. Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin; Österr. Gesellschaft für Geriatrie; Österreichische Gesellschaft für Endokrinologie und Stoffwechsel; Österreichische Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin; Österreichische Gesellschaft für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde. Weber T, et al. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019 Nov;131(Suppl 6):489-590. doi: 10.1007/s00508-019-01565-0. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019. PMID: 31792659 German.
  • The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Hypertension in Patients With Cushing's Syndrome.
    Barbot M, Ceccato F, Scaroni C. Barbot M, et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 May 21;10:321. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00321. eCollection 2019. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019. PMID: 31164868 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Rationale for nebivolol/valsartan combination for hypertension: review of preclinical and clinical data.
    Giles TD, Cockcroft JR, Pitt B, Jakate A, Wright HM. Giles TD, et al. J Hypertens. 2017 Sep;35(9):1758-1767. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001412. J Hypertens. 2017. PMID: 28509722 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378:815–825. - PubMed
    1. Lakka HM, Laaksonen DE, Lakka TA, Niskanen LK, Kumpusalo E, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT. The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men. JAMA. 2002;288:2709–2716. - PubMed
    1. Ingelsson E, Pencina MJ, Tofler GH, Benjamin EJ, Lanier KJ, Jacques PF, Fox CS, Meigs JB, Levy D, Larson MG, Selhub J, D’Agostino RB, Sr, Wang TJ, Vasan RS. Multimarker approach to evaluate the incidence of the metabolic syndrome and longitudinal changes in metabolic risk factors: the Framingham Offspring Study. Circulation. 2007;116:984–992. - PubMed
    1. Grant PJ. Diabetes mellitus as a prothrombotic condition. J Intern Med. 2007;262:157–172. - PubMed
    1. Scheen AJ. Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus through inhibition of the Renin-Angiotensin system. Drugs. 2004;64:2537–2565. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data