[Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany - update 2010]
- PMID: 22354443
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298261
[Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany - update 2010]
Abstract
Background: The results of a national survey from 1998 showed that only around 10 % of orthopaedic surgeons in Germany had strictly implemented modern third-generation cementing techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A 2005 update showed an improvement up to 29.4 %. The study was repeated in 2010 in order to evaluate the current situation and to determine whether modern cementing techniques have become more popular.
Material and methods: A detailed, slightly modified questionnaire regarding cement and bone preparation, cementing techniques on acetabulum and femur, and implant types was sent to 492 German orthopaedic and trauma hospitals, as well as to visiting surgeons with an interest in THA. The survey was conducted over 6 months. The response rate was 51.8 %, 255 questionnaires were available for evaluation and statistical analysis.
Results: Palacos R+G bone cement remained the most widely used cement (52.2 %). The mixing times given varied significantly. Vacuum mixing systems have again become more popular (85.2 %). In the femur 78.6 % of the surgeons attempted to preserve cancellous bone and 77.8 % used pulsatile (jet) lavage. Retrograde cement application via a cement gun was done in 85.8 %. Cement restrictors were used in more than 98 %. Only 72.7 % of the surgeons implemented sustained cement pressurisation and preferred a cement mantle thickness over 2 mm (55.2 %). Only 18.1 % drilled multiple small acetabular keyholes and 66.5 % used jet lavage. In 67.9 % no cement gun was used and in 70.7 % the cement was applied at high viscosity. Cement pressurisation was done manually in 89.1 %. The Müller straight stem device remained the most popular implant. Only 7.4 % of the centres implanted less than 20 and 40.3 % more than 100 cemented stems per year, whereby higher THA volumes correlated with better cementing technique.
Conclusion: The results of this survey demonstrate that, in comparison to 2005, the current state of cemented THA, in particular cementing technique has generally significantly improved. Future emphasis should focus on continued surgeon education and training, as the cementing techniques are of utmost importance for long-term durability.
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Similar articles
-
[Cemented total hip arthroplasty in Germany--an update].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005 Jan-Feb;143(1):48-55. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832406. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005. PMID: 15754232 German.
-
[Status of cementation technique in total hip endoprostheses in Germany].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1999 Mar-Apr;137(2):101-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039342. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1999. PMID: 10408051 German.
-
Current attitudes to cementing techniques in British hip surgery.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Nov;76(6):396-400. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994. PMID: 7702322 Free PMC article.
-
Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.Orthopedics. 2009 Sep;32(9):orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=42839. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090728-16. Orthopedics. 2009. PMID: 19751012 Review.
-
[The third-generation modern cementing technique in hip and knee arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023 Dec;52(12):968-980. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04446-7. Epub 2023 Oct 12. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2023. PMID: 37828239 Review. German.
Cited by
-
[Current design and cement mantle thickness in hip arthroplasty : Theory and analysis of register data].Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Jan;53(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00132-023-04454-7. Epub 2023 Nov 17. Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024. PMID: 37978051 German.
-
An in vitro comparison of tibial tray cementation using gun pressurization or pulsed lavage.Int Orthop. 2014 May;38(5):967-71. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2303-4. Epub 2014 Mar 12. Int Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24619387 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of different cement application techniques for tibial component fixation in TKA.Int Orthop. 2015 Jan;39(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s00264-014-2468-x. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Int Orthop. 2015. PMID: 25082179
-
Does Additive Pressurized Carbon Dioxide Lavage Improve Cement Penetration and Bond Strength in Cemented Arthroplasty?J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 17;10(22):5361. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225361. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34830643 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical