Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Mar;53(3):271-81.
doi: 10.1007/s00108-011-2958-5.

[Ultrasound in oncology: screening and staging]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Ultrasound in oncology: screening and staging]

[Article in German]
S Delorme. Internist (Berl). 2012 Mar.

Abstract

This is a review on the role of ultrasound for early detection and staging of cancer. In breast cancer screening ultrasound serves to clarify mammographically unclear lesions and is a primary screening tool for hereditary breast cancer. Renal neoplasms are commonly diagnosed as incidental sonographic findings and in this case are more often in a curable stage than symptomatic neoplasms. In chronic hepatitis or liver cirrhosis the annual incidence of hepatocellular cancer is more than 2% and ultrasound is used as a screening tool with 60% sensitivity and 97% specificity. According to the literature the sensitivity of native ultrasound for detecting metastases is 60% and the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is 79% or higher, i.e comparable with the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Its role in staging is, however, limited as CT and MRI are necessary for local staging of the primary tumor and also include the liver. In the differential diagnosis of liver lesions the specificity of CEUS ranges from 82% to 99% depending on the lesion entity and is thereby comparable to contrast-enhanced CT. For staging of cervical lymph node metastases ultrasound is preferable to CT or MRI as the sensitivity lies between 79% and 90% and specificity is reported to be 90%.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ultraschall Med. 2009 Jun;30(3):259-68 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jun;18(6):1734-41 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1986 Feb;39(2):183-8 - PubMed
    1. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010 Oct;36(10):1561-7 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Ultrasound. 1992 Jul-Aug;20(6):395-400 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources