Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 May;21(5):761-9.
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0644. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

Smoking behavior and exposure to tobacco toxicants during 6 months of smoking progressively reduced nicotine content cigarettes

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Smoking behavior and exposure to tobacco toxicants during 6 months of smoking progressively reduced nicotine content cigarettes

Neal L Benowitz et al. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: Recent federal legislation gives the U.S. Food and Drug Administration authority to regulate the nicotine content of cigarettes. A nationwide strategy for progressive reduction of the nicotine content of cigarettes is a potential way to reduce the addictiveness of cigarettes, to prevent new smokers from becoming addicted, and to facilitate quitting in established smokers. We conducted a trial of progressive nicotine content tapering over 6 months to determine the effects on smoking behaviors and biomarkers of tobacco smoke exposure and cardiovascular effects.

Methods: One hundred and thirty-five healthy smokers were randomly assigned to one of two groups. A research group smoked their usual brand of cigarettes followed by five types of research cigarettes with progressively lower nicotine content, each smoked for one month. A control group smoked their own brand of cigarettes for the same period of time.

Results: Nicotine intake, as indicated by plasma cotinine concentration, declined progressively as the nicotine content of cigarettes was reduced. Cigarette consumption and markers of exposure to carbon monoxide and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, as well as cardiovascular biomarkers remained stable, whereas urinary 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL) excretion decreased. No significant changes in biomarkers of exposure or cardiovascular effects were observed in controls.

Conclusions: Our data support the proposition that the intake of nicotine from cigarettes of smokers can be substantially lowered without increasing exposure to other tobacco smoke toxins.

Impact: These findings support the feasibility and safety of gradual reduction of the nicotine content in cigarettes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest

Dr. Benowitz is a consultant to several pharmaceutical companies that market medications to aid smoking cessation and has served as a paid expert witness in litigation against tobacco companies. Dr Hall has received material support for an ongoing clinical trial from Pfizer. The other authors have no conflicts to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A - Mean cigarette consumption over 26 weeks of the study in smokers smoking their usual brand of cigarettes (C, N = 50) or during progressive reduction of nicotine content of cigarettes (R, N = 53). R(excNC) indicates subjects in the RNC group excluding those who did not comply with smoking RNC cigarettes only (N = 42). The bars represent SEM. B – Mean plasma cotinine concentration over 26 weeks of the study in smokers smoking their usual brand of cigarettes (C, N = 50) or during progressive reduction of nicotine content of cigarettes (R, N = 53). R(excNC) indicates subjects in the RNC group excluding those who did not comply with smoking RNC cigarettes only (N = 42). The bars represent SEM. C – Mean expired carbon monoxide concentration over 26 weeks of the study in smokers smoking their usual brand of cigarettes (C, N = 50) or during progressive reduction of nicotine content of cigarettes (R, N = 53). R(excNC) indicates subjects in the RNC group excluding those who did not comply with smoking RNC cigarettes only (N = 42). The bars represent SEM.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean percent compensation for smokers during nicotine reduction at different levels of nicotine content. Compensation is calculated based on plasma cotinine levels and machine-determined nicotine yields comparing RNCs to the usual brand.

References

    1. US Congress. US Congress. Public Law: US Government Printing Office; 2009. Jun 22, Family smoking prevention and tobacco control and federal retirement reform. editor.
    1. Benowitz NL, Henningfield JE. Establishing a nicotine threshold for addiction. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:123–125. - PubMed
    1. Henningfield JE, Benowitz NL, Slade J, Houston TP, Davis RM, Deitchman SD. Reducing the addictiveness of cigarettes. Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association. Tob Control. 1998;7:281–293. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tengs TO, Ahmad S, Savage JM, Moore R, Gage E. The AMA proposal to mandate nicotine reduction in cigarettes: a simulation of the population health impacts. Prev Med. 2005;40:170–180. - PubMed
    1. Hatsukami DK, Perkins KA, Lesage MG, Ashley DL, Henningfield JE, Benowitz NL, et al. Nicotine reduction revisited: science and future directions. Tob Control. 2010;19:e1–e10. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types