Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar 20;30(9):972-9.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.6937. Epub 2012 Feb 21.

Adherence to stage-specific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer

Affiliations

Adherence to stage-specific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer

Ryaz Chagpar et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines has been proposed as a measure of cancer care quality. We sought to determine rates of and factors associated with adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines for colon cancer.

Patients and methods: Patients within the National Cancer Data Base treated for colon adenocarcinoma (2003 to 2007) were identified. Adherence to stage-specific NCCN guidelines was determined based on disease stage. Hierarchical regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of adherence, overtreatment, and undertreatment.

Results: A total of 173,243 patients were included in the final cohort, 123,953 (71%) of whom were treated according to NCCN guidelines. Patients with stage I disease were more likely to receive guideline-based treatment (96%) than patients with stage II (low risk, 66%; high risk, 36%), III (71%), or IV (73%) disease (P < .001). Adherence to consensus-based guidelines increased over time. Factors associated with adherence across all stages included age, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index score, later year of diagnosis, and insurance status. Among patients with high-risk stage II or stage III disease, older patients with pre-existing comorbidities and patients with lower socioeconomic status were less likely to be offered adjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients with stage I and II disease, young, healthy patients were more likely to be recommended chemotherapy, in discordance with NCCN guidelines.

Conclusion: Significant variation exists in the treatment of colon cancer, particularly in treatment of high-risk stage II and stage III disease. The impact of nonadherence to guidelines on patient outcomes needs to be further elucidated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Stage-specific treatment for colon cancer based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Selection of the study cohort.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Stage-specific treatment and adherence patterns. Chemo, chemotherapy. (*) Only includes undertreatment (no chemotherapy) or adherent (chemotherapy) patients; no surgery included.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Forest plot of factors predicting adherent treatment for (A) stage I, (B) stage II low-risk, (C) stage II high-risk, and (D) stage III disease. Odds ratios (blue dots) are shown with associated 95% CIs (horizontal lines). Models were also adjusted for sex, education, income, geographic region, and facility type as appropriate. Government includes federal insurance programs such as Veterans Affairs, TRICARE/Military, and Public Health Service. AA, African American; AP, Asian/Pacific Islander.
Fig 5.
Fig 5.
Forest plot of factors predicting undertreatment for (A) high-risk stage II and (B) stage III disease. Odds ratios (blue dots) are shown with associated 95% CIs (horizontal lines). Models were also adjusted for sex, education, income, geographic region, and facility type as appropriate. Government includes federal insurance programs such as Veterans Affairs, TRICARE/Military, and Public Health Service. AA, African American; AP, Asian/Pacific Islander.

References

    1. Hewitt ME, Simone JV. National Cancer Policy Board: Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
    1. Somerfield MR, Einhaus K, Hagerty KL, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines: Opportunities and challenges. J Clin Oncol . 2008;26:4022–4026. - PubMed
    1. Desch CE, McNiff KK, Schneider EC, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures. J Clin Oncol . 2008;26:3631–3637. - PubMed
    1. National Quality Forum Measure Details: National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Quality of Cancer Care. http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2009/05/National_Voluntary_Cons....
    1. Blayney DW, McNiff K, Hanauer D, et al. Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center. J Clin Oncol . 2009;27:3802–3807. - PubMed

Publication types