Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(2):e29659.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029659. Epub 2012 Feb 15.

Avian cholera, a threat to the viability of an Arctic seabird colony?

Affiliations

Avian cholera, a threat to the viability of an Arctic seabird colony?

Sébastien Descamps et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Evidence that infectious diseases cause wildlife population extirpation or extinction remains anecdotal and it is unclear whether the impacts of a pathogen at the individual level can scale up to population level so drastically. Here, we quantify the response of a Common eider colony to emerging epidemics of avian cholera, one of the most important infectious diseases affecting wild waterfowl. We show that avian cholera has the potential to drive colony extinction, even over a very short period. Extinction depends on disease severity (the impact of the disease on adult female survival) and disease frequency (the number of annual epidemics per decade). In case of epidemics of high severity (i.e., causing >30% mortality of breeding females), more than one outbreak per decade will be unsustainable for the colony and will likely lead to extinction within the next century; more than four outbreaks per decade will drive extinction to within 20 years. Such severity and frequency of avian cholera are already observed, and avian cholera might thus represent a significant threat to viability of breeding populations. However, this will depend on the mechanisms underlying avian cholera transmission, maintenance, and spread, which are currently only poorly known.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Female common eider carcasses following an avian cholera outbreak, East Bay colony, Southampton Island, Canada (photo: S. Descamps).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Population model for Common eiders breeding at the East Bay colony, Southampton Island, Canada.
A. Life cycle of common eiders (Southampton Island, Nunavut, Canada) based on three age classes. The population matrix A contains the vital rates and projects the population from time t to t+1. The fertility parameter was calculated as the product between the breeding probability (BP), the average breeding success (BS) and the average number of hatchlings per breeding female (f). SA represents adult survival (survival from 2 years of age onwards), SY survival of yearlings (from 1 to 2 years of age) and SH survival of hatchlings (from hatching to 1 year of age). We considered four different periods based on cholera severity; demographic parameters for each period are shown in B.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Long term stochastic growth rates of the East Bay common eider population (Southampton Island, Canada).
The stochastic growth rates (log-λs) is described as a function of the frequency (number of epidemics per decade) and duration (number of years of epidemics in a row) of avian cholera epidemics. The growth rates were calculated from a stochastic model with two states: no cholera outbreak and cholera outbreak. For the state “cholera outbreak”, we considered different severities (i.e., different level of adult mortality) of epidemics: a low severity as observed in 2005 (A), a moderate severity as observed in 2007 (B) and a high severity as observed in 2006 (C). The black lines denote log-λs = 0; colors correspond to different growth rates ranging from blue (positive growth rate, log-λs>0) to red (negative growth rate, log-λs<0). Areas to the right of the black lines indicate combinations of epidemic frequency and duration that are not sustainable for the population (log-λs<0). The white areas represent impossible combinations of epidemic frequency and duration.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Risk of quasi-extinction for the East Bay common eider colony (Southampton Island, Canada).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Winter aggregation of common eiders in North Atlantic (photo: H.G. Gilchrist).

References

    1. Epstein PR. Climat change and emerging infectious diseases. Microbes and infection. 2001;3:747–754. - PubMed
    1. Harvell CD, Mitchell CE, Ward JR, Altizer S, Dobson AP, et al. Climate warming and disease risks for terrestrial and marine biota. Science. 2002;296:2158–2162. - PubMed
    1. Daszak P, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife - Threats to biodiversity and human health. Science. 2000;287:443–449. - PubMed
    1. LaDeau SL, Kilpatrick AM, Marra PP. West Nile virus emergence and large-scale declines of North American bird populations. Nature. 2007;447:710–714. - PubMed
    1. de Castro F, Bolker B. Mechanisms of disease-induced extinction. Ecology Letters. 2005;8:117–126.

Publication types