Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1997 May;24(1):73-81.
doi: 10.1023/A:1007962903435.

The indirect effects of multiplicity of infection on baculovirus expressed proteins in insect cells: secreted and non-secreted products

Affiliations

The indirect effects of multiplicity of infection on baculovirus expressed proteins in insect cells: secreted and non-secreted products

K M Radford et al. Cytotechnology. 1997 May.

Abstract

The baculovirus expression vector system was employed to produce human apolipoprotein E and β-galactosidase in order to study the effect of multiplicity of infection on secreted and non-secreted recombinant protein production. Prior knowledge of the influence of other cell culture and infection parameters, such as the cell density at time of infection and the time of harvest, allowed determination of the direct and indirect influences of multiplicity of infection on recombinant protein synthesis and degradation in insect cells. Under non-limited, controlled conditions, the direct effect of multiplicity of infection (10(-1)-10 pfu/cell) on specific recombinant product yields of non-secreted β-galactosidase was found to be insignificant. Instead, the observed increased in accumulated product was directly correlated to the total number of infected cells during the production period and therefore ultimately dependent on an adequate supply of nutrients. Only the timing of recombinant virus and protein production was influenced by, and dependent on the multiplicity of infection. Evidence is presented in this study that indicates the extremely limited predictability of post-infection cell growth at very low multiplicities of infection of less than 0.1 pfu/cell. Due to the inaccuracy of the current virus quantification techniques, combined with the sensitivity of post-infection cell growth at low MOI, the possibility of excessive post-infection cell growth and subsequent nutrient limitation was found to be significantly increased. Finally, as an example, the degree of product stability and cellular and viral protein contamination at low multiplicity of infection is investigated for a secreted recombinant form of human apolipoprotein E. Comparison of human apolipoprotein E production and secretion at multiplicities of infection of 10(-4)-10 pfu/cell revealed increased product degradation and contamination with intracellular proteins at low multiplicities of infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Brown M, Faulkner P. Factors affecting the yield of virus in a cloned cell line of Trichoplusia ni infected with a nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 1975;26:251–257. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(75)90057-9. - DOI
    1. Dougherty EM, Weiner RM, Vaughn JL, Reichelderfer CF. Physical factors that affect in vitro Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus production. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1981;41(5):1166–1172. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lazarte JE, Tosi PF, Nicolau C. Optimization of the production of full length rCD4 in baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1992;40:214–217. doi: 10.1002/bit.260400204. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Licari P, Bailey JE. Factors influencing recombinant protein yields in an insect cell-baculovirus expression system: multiplicity of infection and intracellular protein degradation. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1991;37:238–246. doi: 10.1002/bit.260370306. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Licari P, Bailey JE. Modelling the population dynamics of baculovirus-infected insect cells: optimizing infection strategies for enhanced recombinant protein yields. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 1992;39:432–441. doi: 10.1002/bit.260390409. - DOI - PubMed