Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;52(4):289-302.
doi: 10.1007/s10858-012-9603-z. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

RNA-PAIRS: RNA probabilistic assignment of imino resonance shifts

Affiliations

RNA-PAIRS: RNA probabilistic assignment of imino resonance shifts

Arash Bahrami et al. J Biomol NMR. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

The significant biological role of RNA has further highlighted the need for improving the accuracy, efficiency and the reach of methods for investigating RNA structure and function. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is vital to furthering the goals of RNA structural biology because of its distinctive capabilities. However, the dispersion pattern in the NMR spectra of RNA makes automated resonance assignment, a key step in NMR investigation of biomolecules, remarkably challenging. Herein we present RNA Probabilistic Assignment of Imino Resonance Shifts (RNA-PAIRS), a method for the automated assignment of RNA imino resonances with synchronized verification and correction of predicted secondary structure. RNA-PAIRS represents an advance in modeling the assignment paradigm because it seeds the probabilistic network for assignment with experimental NMR data, and predicted RNA secondary structure, simultaneously and from the start. Subsequently, RNA-PAIRS sets in motion a dynamic network that reverberates between predictions and experimental evidence in order to reconcile and rectify resonance assignments and secondary structure information. The procedure is halted when assignments and base-parings are deemed to be most consistent with observed crosspeaks. The current implementation of RNA-PAIRS uses an initial peak list derived from proton-nitrogen heteronuclear multiple quantum correlation ((1)H-(15)N 2D HMQC) and proton-proton nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy ((1)H-(1)H 2D NOESY) experiments. We have evaluated the performance of RNA-PAIRS by using it to analyze NMR datasets from 26 previously studied RNAs, including a 111-nucleotide complex. For moderately sized RNA molecules, and over a range of comparatively complex structural motifs, the average assignment accuracy exceeds 90%, while the average base pair prediction accuracy exceeded 93%. RNA-PAIRS yielded accurate assignments and base pairings consistent with imino resonances for a majority of the NMR resonances, even when the initial predictions are only modestly accurate. RNA-PAIRS is available as a public web-server at http://pine.nmrfam.wisc.edu/RNA/.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Standard steps for solving RNA structures using NMR. The process can be conceptually divided into three main steps: 1 imino proton assignments and secondary structure validation, 2 full resonance assignment and restraint list construction, 3 structure calculation. The vast majority of work in these steps requires manual intervention—although some automation support is available for structure calculation and refinement. Circular arrows indicate some of the possible steps for iterative refinement while the dotted arrow suggests the potential need for construct modifications. Imino regions of 2D NOESY and HMQC NMR spectra are often highly informative for step 1. b Two types of NMR spectra containing information relevant for assigning NMR signals for imino protons and nitrogens in an RNA molecule (BMRB ID 17921)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Design of RNA-PAIRS network is presented in block form. Blocks with heavier dark outlines represent the more complex portions of the algorithm—both in terms of computational complexity as well as algorithm design. The box for “user input” identifies the current peak list input for the software, which will be extended to include other experimental data. The direction of the arrows identifies the “flow of logic” in the software. The rightmost box (that intersects “curved” arrows) is the portion of the software where probabilities are updated using the “back and forth” (reverberating) iteration

References

    1. Ampt KAM, van der Werf RM, Nelissen FHT, et al. The unstable part of the apical stem of duck hepatitis B virus epsilon shows enhanced base pair opening but not pico- to nanosecond dynamics and is essential for reverse transcriptase binding. Biochemistry. 2009;48:10499–10508. doi: 10.1021/bi9011385. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andronescu M, Aguirre-Hernández R, Condon A, Hoos HH. RNAsoft: a suite of RNA secondary structure prediction and design software tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:3416–3422. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bahrami A, Assadi AH, Markley JL, Eghbalnia HR. Probabilistic interaction network of evidence algorithm and its application to complete labeling of peak lists from protein NMR spectroscopy. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5:e1000307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000307. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berjanskii M, Tang P, Liang J, et al. GeNMR: a web server for rapid NMR-based protein structure determination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W670–W677. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp280. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clote P. RNALOSS: a web server for RNA locally optimal secondary structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W600–W604. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki382. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources