Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(2):e31864.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031864. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

Nonadhesive culture system as a model of rapid sphere formation with cancer stem cell properties

Affiliations

Nonadhesive culture system as a model of rapid sphere formation with cancer stem cell properties

Su-Feng Chen et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Background: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) play an important role in tumor initiation, progression, and metastasis and are responsible for high therapeutic failure rates. Identification and characterization of CSC are crucial for facilitating the monitoring, therapy, or prevention of cancer. Great efforts have been paid to develop a more effective methodology. Nevertheless, the ideal model for CSC research is still evolving. In this study, we created a nonadhesive culture system to enrich CSCs from human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines with sphere formation and to characterize their CSC properties further.

Methods: A nonadhesive culture system was designed to generate spheres from the SAS and OECM-1 cell lines. A subsequent investigation of their CSC properties, including stemness, self-renewal, and chemo- and radioresistance in vitro, as well as tumor initiation capacity in vivo, was also performed.

Results: Spheres were formed cost-effectively and time-efficiently within 5 to 7 days. Moreover, we proved that these spheres expressed putative stem cell markers and exhibited chemoradiotherapeutic resistance, in addition to tumor-initiating and self-renewal capabilities.

Conclusions: Using this nonadhesive culture system, we successfully established a rapid and cost-effective model that exhibits the characteristics of CSCs and can be used in cancer research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The sphere formation from human OSCC cell lines.
(A) Phase-contrast photomicrographs of the spheres cultured from SAS (top) and OECM-1 (bottom) cell lines using a nonadhesive design (four leftmost upper and lower panels: from day 0 to day 7, magnification, 200×; and rightmost upper lower panels: day 10, magnification, 100×). (B) Immunohistochemistry results showing diverse expression patterns of representative epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers in OECM1 parental cells and spheres (magnification, 200×).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of the expression of specific surface markers of CSCs between parental cells and spheres.
(A) The parental cells and spheres were either stained with a negative-control IgG antibody (open space) or anti-CD133 experimental antibodies (solid space). (B) Comparison of the expression of ALDH1 between parental cells and spheres; DEAB, an inhibitor of ALDH1, was used as a negative control. (C) Quantitative and statistical comparisons of the percentage of positive signals for CD133 and ALDH1 between parental cells and spheres (*P<0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of the expression of CSC markers between parental cells and spheres.
(A) A RT-PCR analysis showed that the expression of the SOX2, Oct4, and NANOG genes was upregulated in spheres compared with parental cells. (B) Western blotting analysis showed that the expression of SOX2, Oct4, and NANOG was upregulated in spheres compared with parental cells. (C) Immunofluorescence analysis of CSC markers in spheres demonstrated the presence of CSCs with variable levels of expression of CD133, ALDH1, SOX2, Oct4, and NANOG, as indicated by the arrows (magnification, 200×).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Comparison of radio- and chemosensitivity between parental cells and spheres of the two cell lines.
Significant differences in (A) radiosensitivity and (B) chemosensitivity were observed between parental cells and spheres. (C) Combined chemo- and radiotherapy (CCRT) with initial chemotherapy for 24 h followed by radiation. (D) CCRT with initial radiation followed by chemotherapy for 24 h. The two CCRT regimens were more effective in reducing the survival rate of parental cells and spheres compared with single treatment using either radiation or chemotherapy (*P<0.05).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Comparison of newly generated tumors between OECM-1-derived parental cells and spheres in NOD/SCID mice.
(A) Gross appearance of a representative tumor formed by inoculation of parental cells and dissociated spheres into NOD/SCID mice (n = 3 in each group). (B) Corresponding histological findings and immunohistochemical results for representative EMT markers in NOD/SCID mice (magnification, 100×). (C) Primary culture of dissociated cells from OECM-1-induced spheres originally isolated from NOD/SCID mice demonstrated a gradual transformation of primary (1st) and secondary (2nd) spheres (magnification, 100×).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
    1. Al-Swiahb JN, Chen CH, Chuang HC, Fang FM, Tasi HT, et al. Cinical, pathological and molecular determinants in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Future Oncol. 2010;6:837–850. - PubMed
    1. Olasz L, Szabo I, Horvath A. A combined treatment for advanced oral cavity cancers. Cancer. 1988;62:1267–1274. - PubMed
    1. Lippman SM, Sudbo J, Hong WK. Oral cancer prevention and the evolution of molecular-targeted drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:346–356. - PubMed
    1. Le Tourneau C. Molecularly targeted therapy in head and neck cancer. Bull Cancer. 2010;97:1453–1466. - PubMed

Publication types