Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):183-90.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.965020. Epub 2012 Feb 23.

Multiple biomarkers for risk prediction in chronic heart failure

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Multiple biomarkers for risk prediction in chronic heart failure

Bonnie Ky et al. Circ Heart Fail. .

Abstract

Background: Prior studies have suggested using a panel of biomarkers that measure diverse biological processes as a prognostic tool in chronic heart failure. Whether this approach improves risk prediction beyond clinical evaluation is unknown.

Methods and results: In a multicenter cohort of 1513 chronic systolic heart failure patients, we measured a contemporary biomarker panel consisting of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, myeloperoxidase, B-type natriuretic peptide, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor-1, troponin I, soluble toll-like receptor-2, creatinine, and uric acid. From this panel, we calculated a parsimonious multimarker score and assessed its performance in predicting risk of death, cardiac transplantation, or ventricular assist device placement in comparison to an established clinical risk score, the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM). During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, there were 317 outcomes: 187 patients died; 99 were transplanted; and 31 had a ventricular assist device placed. In unadjusted Cox models, patients in the highest tertile of the multimarker score had a 13.7-fold increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with the lowest tertile (95% confidence interval, 8.75-21.5). These effects were independent of the SHFM (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.80; 95% confidence interval, 4.18-11.1). Addition of the multimarker score to the SHFM led to a significantly improved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.803 versus 0.756 (P=0.003) and appropriately reclassified a significant number of patients who had the outcome into a higher risk category (net reclassification improvement, 25.2%; 95% confidence interval, 14.2-36.2%; P<0.001).

Conclusions: In ambulatory chronic heart failure patients, a score derived from multiple biomarkers integrating diverse biological pathways substantially improves prediction of adverse events beyond current metrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Event-free survival according to multimarker score category and tertiles of SHFM*
Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating the incidence of all-cause death, cardiac transplantation, or VAD placement among Penn Heart Failure Study participants according to (A) multimarker score category tertiles (P < 0.001 by log rank test) and (B) Seattle Heart Failure Model score tertiles (P < 0.001 by log rank test) *Multimarker score calculated as described in Table 2
Figure 1
Figure 1. Event-free survival according to multimarker score category and tertiles of SHFM*
Kaplan-Meier curves illustrating the incidence of all-cause death, cardiac transplantation, or VAD placement among Penn Heart Failure Study participants according to (A) multimarker score category tertiles (P < 0.001 by log rank test) and (B) Seattle Heart Failure Model score tertiles (P < 0.001 by log rank test) *Multimarker score calculated as described in Table 2
Figure 2
Figure 2. ROC curves for events at 1 year
ROC curves comparing the ability of the SHFM and the multimarker score to correctly classify patients who died, required cardiac transplantation, or VAD placement by 1 year of followup* *Multimarker score calculated as described in Table 2

References

    1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, De Simone G, Ferguson TB, Flegal K, Ford E, Furie K, Go A, Greenlund K, Haase N, Hailpern S, Ho M, Howard V, Kissela B, Kittner S, Lackland D, Lisabeth L, Marelli A, McDermott M, Meigs J, Mozaffarian D, Nichol G, O’Donnell C, Roger V, Rosamond W, Sacco R, Sorlie P, Stafford R, Steinberger J, Thom T, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wong N, Wylie-Rosett J, Hong Y. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2009;119:480–486. - PubMed
    1. Jessup M, Abraham WT, Casey DE, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Konstam MA, Mancini DM, Rahko PS, Silver MA, Stevenson LW, Yancy CW. 2009 focused update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation. 2009;119:1977–2016. - PubMed
    1. Braunwald E. Biomarkers in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2148–2159. - PubMed
    1. Richards AM. What we may expect from biomarkers in heart failure. Heart Fail Clin. 2009;5:463–470. - PubMed
    1. Cappola TP, Matkovich SJ, Wang W, van Booven D, Li M, Wang X, Qu L, Sweitzer NK, Fang JC, Reilly MP, Hakonarson H, Nerbonne JM, Dorn GW., 2nd Loss-of-function DNA sequence variant in the CLCNKA chloride channel implicates the cardio-renal axis in interindividual heart failure risk variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:2456–2461. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types