After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- PMID: 22361296
- DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100411
After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
Abstract
Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call 'after-birth abortion' (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled.
Keywords: Abortion; adoption; allocation of healthcare resources; enhancement; euthanasia; in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer; infanticide; potentiality; religious ethics.
Comment in
-
Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):257-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101404. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637422 No abstract available.
-
Capacity, harm and experience in the life of persons as equals.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):281-3. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101198. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637427
-
The common premise for uncommon conclusions.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):284-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101163. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637428
-
Infanticide, moral status and moral reasons: the importance of context.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):289-92. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100767. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637429
-
Concern for our vulnerable prenatal and neonatal children: a brief reply to Giubilini and Minerva.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):296-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100617. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637431
-
The Italian reaction to the Giubilini and Minerva paper.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):317-22. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101403. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637439
-
Public distress as a moral consideration in after-birth abortion.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):323. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101164b. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637441 No abstract available.
-
Some comments on the paper 'after-birth abortion: why should the baby live?'.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):323-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101164c. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637442 No abstract available.
-
'After-birth abortion' and arguments from potential.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):324-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101164e. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637444 No abstract available.
-
The moral significance of being born.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):326-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100734. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637446
-
Yes, the baby should live: a pro-choice response to Giubilini and Minerva.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):330-5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100656. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637447
-
Infanticide: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):336-40. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100664. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637448 Free PMC article.
-
Potentials and burdens: a reply to Giubilini and Minerva.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):341-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100844. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637449
-
The moral status of babies.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):345-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100629. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637450
-
Abortion, infanticide and moral context.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):350-2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100661. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637451
-
Of course the baby should live: against 'after-birth abortion'.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):353-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100640. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637452
-
Personhood, harm and interest: a reply to Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e1-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100692. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637453
-
After-birth and before-birth personhood: why the baby should live.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e11-4. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101031. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637454
-
Limitations on personhood arguments for abortion and 'after-birth abortion'.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e15-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100958. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637455
-
Killing fetuses and killing newborns.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e19-20. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100621. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637456
-
After-birth abortion: the intuition argument.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e5. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100688. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637457
-
Why should the baby live? Human right to life and the precautionary principle.J Med Ethics. 2013 May;39(5):e6-e10. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100735. J Med Ethics. 2013. PMID: 23637458
-
A dubious defense of 'after-birth abortion': A reply to Räsänen.Bioethics. 2018 Feb;32(2):132-137. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12413. Epub 2017 Nov 24. Bioethics. 2018. PMID: 29171674
-
Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing: A reply to Räsänen.Bioethics. 2018 Mar;32(3):215-219. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12423. Epub 2018 Jan 25. Bioethics. 2018. PMID: 29369381
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous