Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Mar;5(1):15-23.
doi: 10.1007/s12178-011-9107-6.

Post-operative guidelines following hip arthroscopy

Affiliations

Post-operative guidelines following hip arthroscopy

Jaime Edelstein et al. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Rehabilitation following hip arthroscopy can vary significantly. Existing programs have been developed as a collaborative effort between physicians and rehabilitation specialists. The evolution of protocol advancement has relied upon feedback from patients, therapists and observable outcomes. Although reports of the first femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgeries were reported in the 1930's, it was not until recently that more structured, physiologically based guidelines have been developed and executed. Four phases have been developed in this guideline based on functional and healing milestones achieved which allow the patient to progress to the next level of activity. The goal of Phase I, the protective phase, is to progressively regain 75% of full range of motion (ROM) and normalize gait while respecting the healing process. The primary goal of Phase II is for the patient to gain function and independence in daily activities without discomfort. Rehabilitation goals include uncompensated step up/down on an 8 inch box, as well as, adequate pelvic control during low demand exercises. Phase III goals strive to accomplish pain free, non-compensated recreational activities and higher demand work functions. Manual muscle testing (MMT) grading of 5/5 should be achieved for all hip girdle musculature and an ability to dynamically control body weight in space. Phase IV requires the patient be independent with home and gym programs and be asymptomatic and pain free following workouts. Return to running may be commenced at the 12 week mark, but the proceeding requirements must be achieved. Athletes undergoing the procedure may have an accelerated timetable, based on the underlying pathology. Recognizing the patient's pre-operative health status and post-operative physical demands will direct both the program design and the program timetable.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Hip Pathology Treatment Algorithm
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Eccentric Psoas Training
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Three Point Step with Elastic Band
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Windmill: Stance leg is the affected leg. Alternating arm movements creates dynamic stability over the loaded hip
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Lawn Mower: Unilateral stabilization over the operated leg against resistance moving from hip flexion to neutral hip extension
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Hip Hiking with Tube Resistance: The stance leg is the stabilized leg requiring ipsilateral gluteals and pelvic stabilizers to control motion
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Elastic Band Split Squats: The band pulls the extremity into adduction forcing control and focus on abductor and external rotator strength

References

    1. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, et al. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–272. doi: 10.1007/s11999-007-0060-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray RO. The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. Br J Radiol. 1965;38:810–824. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-38-455-810. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120. - PubMed
    1. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Arthroscopic femoroplasty in the management of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:739–746. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0659-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sussmann PS, Ranawat AS, Lipman J, Lorich DG, Padgett DE, Kelly BT. Arthroscopic versus open osteoplasty of the head-neck junction: a cadaveric investigation. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:1257–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.012. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources