Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 May;36(5):973-983.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1474-7.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of incisional hernia at the site of stoma closure

Aneel Bhangu et al. World J Surg. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: The incidence of incisional hernias at the site of stoma closure is surprisingly unclear. A review of the current literature was undertaken to determine how commonly this complication may occur and to assess the quality of evidence available.

Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify studies reporting the incidence of incisional hernia after closure of an ileostomy or colostomy. Studies including children (<16 years old) and studies in which >10% of the total number were trauma patients were excluded.

Results: Thirty-four studies provided outcomes for 2,729 closed stomas. Median follow-up time was 36 months but was only described in seven studies. Closure of loop ileostomies was the most commonly performed procedure (48%). The overall reported hernia rate was 7%, but with a wide range among studies (0-48%). Most studies based their hernia rates on retrospective clinical findings only. A separate analysis of three studies that were specifically designed to assess for stoma site hernias found the clinical hernia rate to be 30% (28/93) and the combined clinical/radiological hernia rate to be 35% (33/93). From 11 studies reporting reoperation rates, 51% of patients who developed a hernia required a surgical repair (34/66). There was a lower risk of hernia following reversal of ileostomy versus colostomy (odds ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.65).

Conclusions: One in three patients may develop a hernia after stoma closure, and around half of hernias that are detected require repair. Risk of hernia is greater after colostomy closure than after ileostomy closure. Clinical measures to reduce the development of these hernias warrant consideration.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Saha AK, Tapping CR, Foley GT et al (2009) Morbidity and mortality after closure of loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 11:866–871 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Giannakopoulos GF, Veenhof AA, van der Peet DL et al (2009) Morbidity and complications of protective loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 11:609–612 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Mansfield SD, Jensen C, Phair AS et al (2008) Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients. World J Surg 32:2101–2106. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9669-7 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R et al (2001) Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 88:360–363 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Garcia-Botello SA, Garcia-Armengol J, Garcia-Granero E et al (2004) A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg 21:440–446 - PubMed - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources