Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Apr;397(4):513-25.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-012-0918-8. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

Lynch syndrome: clinical, pathological, and genetic insights

Affiliations
Review

Lynch syndrome: clinical, pathological, and genetic insights

Ralph Schneider et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Introduction: Lynch syndrome as the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome and the most common cause of hereditary endometrial cancer is characterized by an autosomal dominant inheritance with a penetrance of 85-90%. The molecular genetic underlying mechanism is a mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes.

Methods: In order to identify patients with Lynch syndrome, a nuclear family history should be ascertained and matched with the Amsterdam criteria. A different approach for identification is the adherence to Bethesda criteria and subsequent testing for microsatellite instability. In patients with unstable tumors as an indicator for mismatch repair deficiency, genetic counseling and mutation analysis are warranted. For families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria, intensified screening is recommended, even if a pathogenic mutation is not identified.

Results: Individuals from families with a proven pathogenic mutation that are tested negative are at normal population risk for cancers and may be dismissed from intensified surveillance. Prophylactic surgery in high-risk individuals without neoplasia is not generally recommended. At the time of a colon primary, however, extended surgery should be discussed in the light of a high rate of metachronous cancers. The worries of impairing functional results have now been evaluated in the light of quality of life in a large international cohort. Interestingly, extended (prophylactic) surgery does not lead to inferior quality of life with equal perioperative risks.

Conclusions: Therefore, taking the risk reduction into account, extended surgery at the time of the first colon primary should at least be discussed, if not recommended. Also, prophylactic hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy at the time of a colorectal primary should be recommended if family planning has been completed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hum Mol Genet. 2002 Nov 1;11(23):2961-7 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 2001 Jun 15;91(12):2417-22 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1982 Jul 15;50(2):360-3 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1998 Nov 15;58(22):5248-57 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1998 May 21;338(21):1481-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources