Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(2):e30843.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030843. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

Effect of bilingualism on lexical stress pattern discrimination in French-learning infants

Affiliations

Effect of bilingualism on lexical stress pattern discrimination in French-learning infants

Ranka Bijeljac-Babic et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Monolingual infants start learning the prosodic properties of their native language around 6 to 9 months of age, a fact marked by the development of preferences for predominant prosodic patterns and a decrease in sensitivity to non-native prosodic properties. The present study evaluates the effects of bilingual acquisition on speech perception by exploring how stress pattern perception may differ in French-learning 10-month-olds raised in bilingual as opposed to monolingual environments. Experiment 1 shows that monolinguals can discriminate stress patterns following a long familiarization to one of two patterns, but not after a short familiarization. In Experiment 2, two subgroups of bilingual infants growing up learning both French and another language (varying across infants) in which stress is used lexically were tested under the more difficult short familiarization condition: one with balanced input, and one receiving more input in the language other than French. Discrimination was clearly found for the other-language-dominant subgroup, establishing heightened sensitivity to stress pattern contrasts in these bilinguals as compared to monolinguals. However, the balanced bilinguals' performance was not better than that of monolinguals, establishing an effect of the relative balance of the language input. This pattern of results is compatible with the proposal that sensitivity to prosodic contrasts is maintained or enhanced in a bilingual population compared to a monolingual population in which these contrasts are non-native, provided that this dimension is used in one of the two languages in acquisition, and that infants receive enough input from that language.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stress pattern discrimination in monolingual and bilingual infants.
Mean orientation times to the familiarized and new stress patterns for 10-month-old infants. Experiment 1: monolinguals in short and long familiarization conditions. Experiment 2: bilinguals (“balanced” and “dominant other language”) in short familiarization condition. The error bars indicate the standard error of the mean.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sorace A, Serratrice L. Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism. 2009;13:195–201.
    1. Oller DK, Eilers R, Urbano R, Cobo-Lewis AB. Development of precursors to speech in infants exposed to two languages. Journal of Child Language. 1997;24:407–425. - PubMed
    1. Kuhl PK, Tsao F-M, Liu H-M. Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003;100:9096–9101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bijeljac-Babic R, Nassurally K, Havy M, Nazzi T. Infants can rapidly learn words in a foreign language. Infant Behavior and Development. 2009;32:476–480. - PubMed
    1. Werker JF, Tees RC. Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior Development. 1984;7:49–63.

Publication types