Vicarious experience affects patients' treatment preferences for depression
- PMID: 22363603
- PMCID: PMC3283627
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031269
Vicarious experience affects patients' treatment preferences for depression
Abstract
Purpose: Depression is common in primary care but often under-treated. Personal experiences with depression can affect adherence to therapy, but the effect of vicarious experience is unstudied. We sought to evaluate the association between a patient's vicarious experiences with depression (those of friends or family) and treatment preferences for depressive symptoms.
Methods: We sampled 1054 English and/or Spanish speaking adult subjects from July through December 2008, randomly selected from the 2008 California Behavioral Risk Factor Survey System, regarding depressive symptoms and treatment preferences. We then constructed a unidimensional scale using item analysis that reflects attitudes about antidepressant pharmacotherapy. This became the dependent variable in linear regression analyses to examine the association between vicarious experiences and treatment preferences for depressive symptoms.
Results: Our sample was 68% female, 91% white, and 13% Hispanic. Age ranged from 18-94 years. Mean PHQ-9 score was 4.3; 14.5% of respondents had a PHQ-9 score >9.0, consistent with active depressive symptoms. Analyses controlling for current depression symptoms and socio-demographic factors found that in patients both with (coefficient 1.08, p = 0.03) and without (coefficient 0.77, p = 0.03) a personal history of depression, having a vicarious experience (family and friend, respectively) with depression is associated with a more favorable attitude towards antidepressant medications.
Conclusions: Patients with vicarious experiences of depression express more acceptance of pharmacotherapy. Conversely, patients lacking vicarious experiences of depression have more negative attitudes towards antidepressants. When discussing treatment with patients, clinicians should inquire about vicarious experiences of depression. This information may identify patients at greater risk for non-adherence and lead to more tailored patient-specific education about treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Depression treatment preferences of Hispanic individuals: exploring the influence of ethnicity, language, and explanatory models.J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;24(1):39-50. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.01.100118. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011. PMID: 21209343 Free PMC article.
-
Factors predicting adherence to antidepressant treatment.Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;27(5):344-9. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000086. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 25033275 Review.
-
Patient experiences of taking antidepressants for depression: a secondary qualitative analysis.Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Nov-Dec;9(6):884-902. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Dec 4. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013. PMID: 23219056
-
Antidepressants are not overprescribed for mild depression.J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;76(12):1627-32. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09162. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015. PMID: 26580702 Free PMC article.
-
[Depressive symptoms during anorexia nervosa: State of the art and consequences for an appropriate use of antidepressants].Encephale. 2017 Feb;43(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.02.017. Epub 2016 Jul 21. Encephale. 2017. PMID: 27452149 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Should treatment for depression be based more on patient preference?Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Oct 9;7:1047-57. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S52746. eCollection 2013. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013. PMID: 24143080 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura patients' attitudes toward depression management: A qualitative study.Health Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 29;2(11):e136. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.136. eCollection 2019 Oct. Health Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31768419 Free PMC article.
-
A Social Media Website (Supporting Our Valued Adolescents) to Support Treatment Uptake for Adolescents With Depression and/or Anxiety and Their Parents: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jan 23;8(1):e12117. doi: 10.2196/12117. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019. PMID: 30672741 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the referral of patients with elevated blood pressure to health resources in an under-resourced community in South Africa.BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17359-z. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38331796 Free PMC article.
-
Preferences for Depression Treatment Including Internet-Based Interventions: Results From a Large Sample of Primary Care Patients.Front Psychiatry. 2018 May 17;9:181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00181. eCollection 2018. Front Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 29867605 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Trivedi MH, Lin EH, Katon WJ. Consensus recommendations for improving adherence, self-management, and outcomes in patients with depression. CNS Spectr. 2007;12:1–27. - PubMed
-
- Bambauer KZ, Soumerai SB, Adams AS, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D. Provider and patient characteristics associated with antidepressant nonadherence: the impact of provider specialty. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68:867–873. - PubMed
-
- Burra TA, Chen E, McIntyre RS, Grace SL, Blackmore ER, et al. Predictors of self-reported antidepressant adherence. Behav Med. 2007;32:127–134. - PubMed
-
- Shigemura J, Ogawa T, Yoshino A, Sato Y, Nomura S. Predictors of antidepressant adherence: results of a Japanese Internet-based survey. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2010;64:179–186. - PubMed
-
- Demyttenaere K. Risk factors and predictors of compliance in depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2003;13(Suppl 3):S69–75. - PubMed