Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Feb 24:12:10.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-10.

Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review

Francis Lau  1 , Morgan Price, Jeanette Boyd, Colin Partridge, Heidi Bell, Rebecca Raworth
Affiliations

Impact of electronic medical record on physician practice in office settings: a systematic review

Francis Lau et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. .

Abstract

Background: Increased investments are being made for electronic medical records (EMRs) in Canada. There is a need to learn from earlier EMR studies on their impact on physician practice in office settings. To address this need, we conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of EMRs in the physician office, factors that influenced their success, and the lessons learned.

Results: For this review we included publications cited in Medline and CINAHL between 2000 and 2009 on physician office EMRs. Studies were included if they evaluated the impact of EMR on physician practice in office settings. The Clinical Adoption Framework provided a conceptual scheme to make sense of the findings and allow for future comparison/alignment to other Canadian eHealth initiatives.In the final selection, we included 27 controlled and 16 descriptive studies. We examined six areas: prescribing support, disease management, clinical documentation, work practice, preventive care, and patient-physician interaction. Overall, 22/43 studies (51.2%) and 50/109 individual measures (45.9%) showed positive impacts, 18.6% studies and 18.3% measures had negative impacts, while the remaining had no effect. Forty-eight distinct factors were identified that influenced EMR success. Several lessons learned were repeated across studies: (a) having robust EMR features that support clinical use; (b) redesigning EMR-supported work practices for optimal fit; (c) demonstrating value for money; (d) having realistic expectations on implementation; and (e) engaging patients in the process.

Conclusions: Currently there is limited positive EMR impact in the physician office. To improve EMR success one needs to draw on the lessons from previous studies such as those in this review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical Adoption Framework with the micro, meso and macro dimensions that affect HIS success [17].
Figure 2
Figure 2
A flow chart of the study selection process and results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Micro, meso and macro-level factors that influenced EMR success.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Canadian Medical Association. Information Technology and Health care in Canada: 2010 Status Report. http://www.cma.ca/IThandbook
    1. Canada Health Infoway. Unlocking the Value of Health Information Systems - Corporate Business Plan 2010-2011. https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/flash/lang-en/bp2010-2011/docs/Business...
    1. Schoen C, Osborn R, Doty MM, Squires D, Peugh J, Applebaum S. A survey of primary care physicians in eleven countries, 2009: Perspectives on care, costs and experiences. Health Aff. 2009;28(6):21171–21183. - PubMed
    1. Lai JK, Lau F, Shaw N. A study of information technology use and implementation of electronic medical record systems in BC medical practices. BC Medical Journal. 2009;51(3):114–121.
    1. Terry AL, Thorpe CF, Giles G, Brown JB, Harris SB, Reid GJ, Thind A, Stewart M. Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54(7):730–736. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources