Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls
- PMID: 22365377
- PMCID: PMC3319255
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.09.023
Predictors of walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, and asymptomatic controls
Abstract
Objective: To examine predictors of community walking performance and walking capacity in people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), compared with people with low back pain and asymptomatic control subjects.
Design: Retrospective analysis.
Setting: University spine program.
Participants: Participants (N=126; 50 LSS, 44 low back pain, 32 asymptomatic control subjects) aged 55 to 80 years were studied.
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main outcome measures: Seven-day community walking distance measured by pedometer (walking performance) and a 15-minute walking test (walking capacity). All participants had lumbosacral magnetic resonance imaging, electrodiagnostic testing, and a history and physical examination, including a history of pain and neurologic symptoms, a straight leg raise test, and tests for directional symptoms, reflexes, strength, and nerve tension signs. The study questionnaire included demographic information, a history of back/leg pain, and questions about walking, exercise frequency, and pain level, as well as the standardized Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale.
Results: Body mass index (BMI), pain, age, and female sex predicted walking performance (r(2)=.41) and walking capacity (r(2)=.41). The diagnosis of LSS itself had no clear relationship with either walking variable. Compared with the asymptomatic group, LSS participants had significantly lower values for all walking parameters, with the exception of stride length, while there was no significant difference between the LSS and low back pain groups.
Conclusions: BMI, pain, female sex, and age predict walking performance and capacity in people with LSS, those with low back pain, and asymptomatic control subjects. While pain was the strongest predictor of walking capacity, BMI was the strongest predictor of walking performance. Average pain, rather than leg pain, was predictive of walking performance and capacity. Obesity and pain are modifiable predictors of walking deficits that could be targets for future intervention studies aimed at increasing walking performance and capacity in both the low back pain and LSS populations.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Correlation of lateral stenosis in MRI with symptoms, walking capacity and EMG findings in patients with surgically confirmed lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jul 23;15:247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-247. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014. PMID: 25051886 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of objectively measured walking capacity in people with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(4):345-52. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130390. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013. PMID: 23948821
-
Comparison of radicular symptoms caused by lumbar disc herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):1282-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828f463e. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23462576
-
Effectiveness of Conservative Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Pain, Disability, Physical Capacity, and Physical Activity Behavior in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Nov;102(11):2247-2260.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.033. Epub 2021 Apr 29. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021. PMID: 33933439
-
Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of patient history, clinical findings, and physical tests in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.Eur Spine J. 2020 Jan;29(1):93-112. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06048-4. Epub 2019 Jul 16. Eur Spine J. 2020. PMID: 31312914
Cited by
-
Effects of pre-surgery physiotherapy on walking ability and lower extremity strength in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder: Secondary outcomes of the PREPARE randomised controlled trial.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 24;20(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2850-3. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019. PMID: 31651299 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review.Eur Spine J. 2014 Jun;23(6):1282-301. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3262-6. Epub 2014 Mar 15. Eur Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24633719
-
Preoperative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and FRAX in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Oct 16;13(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0964-1. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 30326950 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical influences of gait patterns on knee joint: Kinematic & EMG analysis.PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233593. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32470052 Free PMC article.
-
Three-year results of the MOTION randomized controlled trial for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis using the percutaneous mild® Procedure.Interv Pain Med. 2025 Mar 12;4(1):100561. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100561. eCollection 2025 Mar. Interv Pain Med. 2025. PMID: 40161895 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, et al. Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1996;21:796–803. - PubMed
-
- Atlas SJ, Delitto A. Spinal stenosis: surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin.Orthop. Relat Res. 2006;443:198–207. 198–207. - PubMed
-
- Arbit E, Pannullo S. Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review. Clin.Orthop.Relat Res. 2001:137–43. - PubMed
-
- Binder DK, Schmidt MH, Weinstein PR. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Semin.Neurol. 2002;22:157–66. - PubMed
-
- Chad DA. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurol.Clin. 2007;25:407–18. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical