Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;26(5):475-87.
doi: 10.1007/s10822-012-9554-1. Epub 2012 Feb 25.

Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge

Affiliations

Blind prediction of host-guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge

Hari S Muddana et al. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2012 May.

Abstract

The computational prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities is of central interest in early-stage drug-discovery, and there is a widely recognized need for improved methods. Low molecular weight receptors and their ligands--i.e., host-guest systems--represent valuable test-beds for such affinity prediction methods, because their small size makes for fast calculations and relatively facile numerical convergence. The SAMPL3 community exercise included the first ever blind prediction challenge for host-guest binding affinities, through the incorporation of 11 new host-guest complexes. Ten participating research groups addressed this challenge with a variety of approaches. Statistical assessment indicates that, although most methods performed well at predicting some general trends in binding affinity, overall accuracy was not high, as all the methods suffered from either poor correlation or high RMS errors or both. There was no clear advantage in using explicit versus implicit solvent models, any particular force field, or any particular approach to conformational sampling. In a few cases, predictions using very similar energy models but different sampling and/or free-energy methods resulted in significantly different results. The protonation states of one host and some guest molecules emerged as key uncertainties beyond the choice of computational approach. The present results have implications for methods development and future blind prediction exercises.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Crystal structures of hosts H1, H2, and H3, and chemical structures of guests G1-G9. Host H1 and its respective guests (G1-G7) are shaded in blue; hosts H2 and H3 with their respective common guests (G8 and G9) are shaded in orange.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Individual predictions submitted for the SAMPL3 host-guest blind prediction challenge. The numbers indicated in the top left corner of each plot corresponds to the submission ID given in Table 2. Host1 systems are indicated by black open circles, whereas hosts 2 and 3 are indicated by red open squares. The blue dotted lines indicate an error range of ± 2 kcal/mol.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:935–949. - PubMed
    1. Gilson MK, Zhou HX. Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. Annu Rev Bioph Biom. 2007;36:21–42. - PubMed
    1. Gallicchio E, Levy RM. Recent theoretical and computational advances for modeling protein-ligand binding affinities. Adv Protein Chem Str. 2011;85:27–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Houk KN, Leach AG, Kim SP, Zhang X. Binding affinities of host-guest, protein-ligand, and protein-transition-state complexes. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2003;42:4872–4897. - PubMed
    1. Chen W, Chang CE, Gilson MK. Calculation of cyclodextrin binding affinities: energy, entropy, and implications for drug design. Biophys J. 2004;87:3035–3049. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources