Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 Oct;30(5):651-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0840-2. Epub 2012 Feb 26.

Laparoscopic "single knot-single running" suture vesico-urethral anastomosis with posterior musculofascial reconstruction

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Laparoscopic "single knot-single running" suture vesico-urethral anastomosis with posterior musculofascial reconstruction

Giuseppe Simone et al. World J Urol. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe results of a simplified technique to configure the vesicourethral anastomosis and to restore posterior musculofascial plate during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a "single knot-single running" suture.

Methods: Between December 2006 and 2009, a conventional Van Velthoven anastomosis (group A) was applied in 125 cases while the novel anastomosis was applied in 155 consecutive patients (group B). A between group comparison of continence recovery was performed with log-rank test and Chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared with Wilcoxon's test and categorical ones with Chi-square test.

Results: Median operative time and median time to configure the anastomosis were comparable between two groups. Proportions of patients using 0 pad, 1 pad and >1 pad per day were statistically different between groups at 1 month (54.4%, 14.4%, 31.2% vs. 52.3%, 27.7%, 20%, in group A and group B, respectively; p = 0.01), at 3 months (73.6%, 8.8%, 17.6% vs. 86.5%, 7.1%, 6.5%; p = 0.01) and at 6 months (80.8%, 12.8%, 6.4% vs. 92.3%, 6.5%, 1.2%; p = 0.01). At log-rank test, continence recovery between two groups was statistically different (p = 0.008).

Conclusions: The excellent outcome together with the easiness of performing this novel anastomosis compared to the traditional Van Velthoven make it widely reproducible.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95(6):766-71 - PubMed
    1. J Urol. 1998 Oct;160(4):1301-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):376-83 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905 - PubMed
    1. Int J Urol. 2011 Jan;18(1):76-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources