Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Jun;21(2):134-48.
doi: 10.1002/mpr.1350. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

Meta-analysis of self-reported substance use compared with laboratory substance assay in general adult mental health settings

Matthew M Large  1 , Glen Smith, Grant Sara, Michael B Paton, Karina Karolina Kedzior, Olav B Nielssen
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis of self-reported substance use compared with laboratory substance assay in general adult mental health settings

Matthew M Large et al. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2012 Jun.

Abstract

An accurate assessment of substance use is necessary to make a correct psychiatric diagnosis and to provide appropriate treatment. This study uses meta-analysis to establish the strength of the association between self-reported substance use and the results of laboratory substance assay including the testing for specific substances and screening for any substance use in psychiatric hospitals and in community mental health settings. A systematic search for published studies was supplemented by additional data required for meta-analysis provided by several researchers in this field. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we calculated the pooled estimate of the odds ratio of a positive substance assay in patients reporting use or non-use of substances and estimated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Very strong associations were found between self-reported use and positive tests for cannabis [N = 11 studies, odds ratio (OR) = 22.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.1-49.1], amphetamines (N = 8, OR = 26.6; 95% CI = 7.9-88.9), cocaine (N = 8, OR = 39.7; 95% CI = 16.2-97.2) and opiates (N = 7, OR = 83.5; 95% CI = 26.7-260.7). Strong associations were found between self-reported use of any substance and positive substance screening (N = 15, OR = 7.2, 95% CI = 3.6-14.1) and tests for alcohol use (N = 5, OR = 8.5; 95% CI = 2.5-28.4). Screening for any substance use had a sensitivity of 61% and a specificity of 66%. Testing for individual substances was specific but lacked sensitivity. Screening has the potential to detect clinically relevant substances that would not be reported by the patient, whereas testing for a specific substance has little advantage over self-report. The sensitivity of the substance assay might be improved by obtaining a sample at the earliest opportunity. Consideration should be given to the increased use of substance screening in general adult mental health settings because it could improve the accuracy of psychiatric diagnosis and increase the likelihood of patients receiving treatment for substance use disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of searches.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of studies of the association between self‐reports of substance use and substance assay.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Albanese M.J., Bartel R.L., Bruno R.F., Morgenbesser M.W., Schatzberg A.F. (1994) Comparison of measures used to determine substance abuse in an inpatient psychiatric population. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(7), 1077–1078. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association . (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM‐IV‐TR), Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Press.
    1. Andreasson S., Allebeck P., Engstrom A., Rydberg U. (1987) Cannabis and schizophrenia. A longitudinal study of Swedish conscripts. Lancet, 330(8574), 1483–1486. - PubMed
    1. Appleby L., Luchins D.J., Dyson V. (1995) Effects of mandatory drug screens on substance use diagnoses in a mental hospital population. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 183(3), 183–184. - PubMed
    1. Badawi N., Simonsen K.W., Steentoft A., Bernhoft I.M., Linnet K. (2009) Simultaneous screening and quantification of 29 drugs of abuse in oral fluid by solid‐phase extraction and ultraperformance LC‐MS/MS. Clincial Chemistry, 55(11), 2004–2018, DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.122341 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types