Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria using hand and rotary systems : An in vitro study
- PMID: 22368332
- PMCID: PMC3284010
- DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.92603
Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria using hand and rotary systems : An in vitro study
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the bacteria extruded apically during root canal preparation using two hand and rotary instrumentation techniques.
Materials and methods: Eighty freshly extracted mandibular premolars were mounted in bacteria collection apparatus. Root canals were contaminated with the pure culture of Enterococcus fecalis (ATCC 29212) and dried at 37°C for 24 h. Bacteria extruded were collected, incubated in brain heart infusion agar for 24 h at 36°C and the colony forming units (CFU) were counted.
Statistical analysis: The mean number of colony forming units were calculated by One-way ANOVA and comparison between the groups made by multiple comparison (Dunnet D) test.
Results: The step-back technique extruded highest number of bacteria in comparison to other hand and rotary Ni-Ti systems.
Conclusion: Under the limitation of this study all hand and rotary instrumentation techniques extruded bacteria. Among all the instrumentation techniques step-back technique extruded more number of bacteria and K-3 system the least. Further in vivo research in this direction could provide more insight into the biologic factors associated and focus on bacterial species that essentially play a major role in post instrumentation flare-ups.
Keywords: Apical extrusion; bacteria; hand and rotary systems.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jul;16(4):300-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.114353. J Conserv Dent. 2013. PMID: 23956529 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative evaluation of apical bacterial extrusion following root canal instrumentation using different endodontic file systems: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2019 Nov-Dec;22(6):559-563. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_221_19. Epub 2020 Aug 20. J Conserv Dent. 2019. PMID: 33088065 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of various endodontic instrumentation systems on the amount of apically extruded bacteria - An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2020 May-Jun;23(3):270-274. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_298_20. Epub 2020 Dec 4. J Conserv Dent. 2020. PMID: 33551598 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using rotary ProTaper, K3XF, twisted and hand K-file system: An ex vivo study.Indian J Dent Res. 2015 Jul-Aug;26(4):406-10. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.167625. Indian J Dent Res. 2015. PMID: 26481889
-
Apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using hand and rotary systems: A comparative study.J Conserv Dent. 2011 Apr;14(2):187-90. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.82622. J Conserv Dent. 2011. PMID: 21814364 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Postoperative pain after endodontic treatment of mandibular molars with two different instrumentation techniques: A randomized clinical trial.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Jul 25;20:83. eCollection 2023. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023. PMID: 37674570 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial efficacy of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, and ozonated water as irrigants in mesiobuccal root canals with severe curvature of mandibular molars.Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):94-99. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_324_17. Eur J Dent. 2018. PMID: 29657531 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study.J Conserv Dent. 2013 Jul;16(4):300-3. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.114353. J Conserv Dent. 2013. PMID: 23956529 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris in Root Canals prepared by Single-file Reciprocating and Single File Rotary Instrumentation Systems: A Comparative In vitro Study.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1398-S1401. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_225_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021. PMID: 35017997 Free PMC article.
-
The self-adjusting file instrumentation results in less debris extrusion apically when compared to WaveOne and ProTaper NEXT.J Conserv Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;18(2):89-93. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.153057. J Conserv Dent. 2015. PMID: 25829683 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in Endodontics: I Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985;11:472–8. - PubMed
-
- McKendry DJ. Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: Quantification of extruded apical debris. J Endod. 1990;16:24–7. - PubMed
-
- Siqueria JF. Microbial causes of endodontic Flare ups. Int Endod J. 2003;36:453–63. - PubMed
-
- Tanalp J, Kaptan F, Sert S, Kayahan B, Bayirl G. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using three different rotary instrumentation systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radio Endod. 2006;101:250–7. - PubMed
-
- Al-Omari MA, Dummer PM. Canal Blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod. 1995;21:154–8. - PubMed