Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2012 Jan;15(1):80-3.
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.92613.

Tooth fragment reattachment technique on a pluri traumatized tooth

Affiliations
Case Reports

Tooth fragment reattachment technique on a pluri traumatized tooth

Giuseppe Lo Giudice et al. J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jan.

Abstract

This case report describes and analyses a tooth fragment reattachment technique used to resolve crown fractures of the anterior teeth. This treatment allows a conservative approach to traumatic coronal lesions offering a better possibility of maintaining aesthetics and function. The authors have illustrated here a clinical case of a fractured incisor. This case is characterized by several traumas on the same tooth that required different therapeutic solutions. We used an easy and ultra-conservative technique without any tooth preparation in the first and third traumatic injuries. In the second trauma, a direct restoration of the fractured tooth was performed. The adhesive reattachment is a simple system to achieve good aesthetic and functional results.Our clinical experiences demonstrated that, when tooth and fragment margins are intact, the reattachment technique without any tooth preparation is a simple and predictable procedure. Quality of adhesion is shown by the retention of the reattached fragment in the second trauma that caused only partial enamel fractures.

Keywords: Adhesive technique; crown fracture; dental trauma; reattachment; tooth fragment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
First trauma ((a) facial view of the fracture; (b) radiographic control; (c) postoperative view demonstrating a light color mismatch; (d) after 10 days in a humid environment the fragment recovers its original color)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Second trauma ((a,b) buccal and occlusal view after the second trauma; (c, d) buccal and occlusal view after the direct restoration)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Third trauma ((a) occlusal view; (b) radiographic control; (c) intra-operative view; (d) reattachment completed)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Follow-up control (5.5 years from the first injury) ((a) radiographic control (b) clinical appearance)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reis A, Loguercio AD. Tooth fragment reattachment: current treatment concepts. Pract Period Aesthet Dent. 2004;16:739–40. - PubMed
    1. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM. Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. Copenhagen: Munksgaard Publishers; 1993.
    1. Eden E, Yanar SC, Sönmez Ş. Reattachmnet of subgingivally fractured central incisor with an open apex. Dent Traumatol. 2007;23:184–9. - PubMed
    1. Pusman E, Cehreli ZC, Altay N, Unver B, Saracbasi O, Ozgun G. Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: Effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive materials. Dent Traumatol. 2010;26:9–15. - PubMed
    1. Demarco FF, De Moura FR, Tarquinio SB, Lima FG. Reattachment using a fragment from an extracted tooth to treat complicated coronal fracture. Dent Traumatol. 2008;24:157–61. - PubMed

Publication types