Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Mar;129(3):480-4.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2121. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

Enrollment of extremely low birth weight infants in a clinical research study may not be representative

Wade Rich  1 , Neil N Finer, Marie G Gantz, Nancy S Newman, Angelita M Hensman, Ellen C Hale, Kathy J Auten, Kurt Schibler, Roger G Faix, Abbot R Laptook, Bradley A Yoder, Abhik Das, Seetha Shankaran; SUPPORT and Generic Database Subcommittees of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network
Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Enrollment of extremely low birth weight infants in a clinical research study may not be representative

Wade Rich et al. Pediatrics. 2012 Mar.

Abstract

Background and objective: The Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial (SUPPORT) antenatal consent study demonstrated that mothers of infants enrolled in the SUPPORT trial had significantly different demographics and exposure to antenatal steroids compared with mothers of eligible, but not enrolled infants. The objective of this analysis was to compare the outcomes of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe retinopathy of prematurity, severe intraventricular hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia (IVH/PVL), death, and death/severe IVH/PVL for infants enrolled in SUPPORT in comparison with eligible, but not enrolled infants.

Methods: Perinatal characteristics and neonatal outcomes were compared for enrolled and eligible but not enrolled infants in bivariate analyses. Models were created to test the effect of enrollment in SUPPORT on outcomes, controlling for perinatal characteristics.

Results: There were 1316 infants enrolled in SUPPORT; 3053 infants were eligible, but not enrolled. In unadjusted analyses, enrolled infants had significantly lower rates of death before discharge, severe IVH/PVL, death/severe IVH/PVL (all < 0.001), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (P = .003) in comparison with eligible, but not enrolled infants. The rate of severe retinopathy of prematurity was not significantly different. After adjustment for perinatal factors, enrollment in the trial was not a significant predictor of any of the tested clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: The results of this analysis demonstrate significant outcome differences between enrolled and eligible but not enrolled infants in a trial using antenatal consent, which were likely due to enrollment bias resulting from the antenatal consent process. Additional research and regulatory review need to be conducted to ensure that large moderate-risk trials that require antenatal consent can be conducted in such a way as to ensure the generalizability of results.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00233324.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, et al. SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(21):1970–1979 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carlo WA, Finer NN, Walsh MC, et al. SUPPORT Study Group of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Neonatal Research Network Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(21):1959–1969 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rich WD, Auten KJ, Gantz MG, et al. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network Antenatal consent in the SUPPORT trial: challenges, costs, and representative enrollment. Pediatrics. 2010;126(1). Available at: www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/126/1/e215 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmidt B, Gillie P, Caco C, Roberts J, Roberts R. Do sick newborn infants benefit from participation in a randomized clinical trial? J Pediatr. 1999;134(2):151–155 - PubMed
    1. Davis S, Wright PW, Schulman SF, et al. Participants in prospective, randomized clinical trials for resected non-small cell lung cancer have improved survival compared with nonparticipants in such trials. Cancer. 1985;56(7):1710–1718 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data