Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Mar 26;172(6):477-83.
doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1977. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

Osteoporosis telephonic intervention to improve medication regimen adherence: a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Osteoporosis telephonic intervention to improve medication regimen adherence: a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial

Daniel H Solomon et al. Arch Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: Multiple studies demonstrate poor adherence to medication regimens prescribed for chronic illnesses, including osteoporosis, but few interventions have been proven to enhance adherence. We examined the effectiveness of a telephone-based counseling program rooted in motivational interviewing to improve adherence to a medication regimen for osteoporosis.

Methods: We conducted a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Participants were recruited from a large pharmacy benefits program for Medicare beneficiaries. All potentially eligible individuals had been newly prescribed a medication for osteoporosis. Consenting participants were randomized to a program of telephone-based counseling (n = 1046) using a motivational interviewing framework or a control group (n = 1041) that received mailed educational materials. Medication regimen adherence was the primary outcome compared across treatment arms and was measured as the median (interquartile range) medication possession ratio, calculated as the ratio of days with filled prescriptions to total days of follow-up.

Results: The groups were balanced at baseline, with a mean age of 78 years; 93.8% were female. In an intention-to-treat analysis, median adherence was 49% (interquartile range, 7%-88%) in the intervention arm and 41% (2%-86%) in the control arm (P = .07, Kruskal-Wallis test). There were no differences in self-reported fractures.

Conclusion: In this randomized controlled trial, we did not find a statistically significant improvement in adherence to an osteoporosis medication regimen using a telephonic motivational interviewing intervention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00567294.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The CONSORT diagram illustrates the assembly of the study cohort and its follow-up through the trial procedures. Ten subjects (4 in the intervention arm and 6 in the control arm) died between recruitment and the start of follow-up 30 days later and were excluded from analyses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
This histogram displays the distribution of adherence for intervention (white) and control arm (grey), by decile of medication possession ratio.
Figure 3
Figure 3
This histogram displays the median medication possession ratios for six 60-day intervals, by treatment assignment, with intervention in purple and control in red. The interaction effect between treatment arm and sequential 60-day periods during follow-up was not statistically significant (P for interaction = 0.60).
Figure 4
Figure 4
This figure illustrates the persistence over time in use of medications for osteoporosis. The intervention arm is show in red and the control arm in blue.

Comment in

  • Does motivational interviewing improve outcomes?
    Berkowitz SA, Johansen KL. Berkowitz SA, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Mar 26;172(6):463-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.155. Epub 2012 Feb 27. Arch Intern Med. 2012. PMID: 22371877 No abstract available.

References

    1. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;353(5):487–497. [see comment]. - PubMed
    1. Kothawala P, Badamgarav E, Ryu S, Miller RM, Halbert RJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world adherence to drug therapy for osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Dec;82(12):1493–1501. - PubMed
    1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Mar;22(3):465–475. - PubMed
    1. Favus MJ. Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. Nov 18;363(21):2027–2035. - PubMed
    1. Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ, Chan WW, Lewiecki EM. Bisphosphonates and osteoporotic fractures: a cross-design synthesis of results among compliant/persistent postmenopausal women in clinical practice versus randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos Int. Apr;21(4):679–688. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data