Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2012 May 3;119(18):4123-8.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-01-405456. Epub 2012 Feb 27.

Phase 2 study of rituximab plus ABVD in patients with newly diagnosed classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase 2 study of rituximab plus ABVD in patients with newly diagnosed classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Anas Younes et al. Blood. .

Abstract

In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of rituximab in combination with standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (RABVD) in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). In this phase 2 study, patients with chemotherapy-naive, advanced-stage cHL were treated with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks and standard ABVD for 6 cycles. The primary outcome was event-free survival (EFS) at 5 years. Eighty-five patients were enrolled, of whom 78 were eligible. With a median follow-up duration of 68 months (range, 26-110), and based on an intent-to-treat analysis, the 5-year EFS and overall survival rates were 83% and 96%, respectively. The 5-year EFS for patients with stage III/IV cHL was 82%. Furthermore, the 5-year EFS for patients with an International Prognostic Score of 0-2 was 88% and for those with a score of > 2, it was 73%. The most frequent treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (23%), fatigue (9%), and nausea (8%). Our results demonstrate that the addition of rituximab to ABVD is safe and has a promising clinical activity in patients with advanced-stage cHL. These data are currently being confirmed in a multicenter randomized trial.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00504504.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study profile.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curves showing the survival of patients. (A) EFS and OS in all patients. (B) EFS by Ann Arbor stage. (C) EFS by IPS grouping.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curves showing the survival of patients. (A) EFS by CD20 status on malignant cells. (B) EFS by interim PET result.

Comment in

References

    1. Canellos GP, Anderson JR, Propert KJ, et al. Chemotherapy of advanced Hodgkin's disease with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP alternating with ABVD. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(21):1478–1484. - PubMed
    1. Connors JM. State-of-the-art therapeutics: Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(26):6400–6408. - PubMed
    1. Engert A, Diehl V, Franklin J, et al. Escalated-dose BEACOPP in the treatment of patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: 10 years of follow-up of the GHSG HD9 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(27):4548–4554. - PubMed
    1. Viviani S, Zinzani PL, Rambaldi A, et al. ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin's lymphoma when high-dose salvage is planned. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(3):203–212. - PubMed
    1. Evens AM, Hutchings M, Diehl V. Treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma: the past, present, and future. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008;5(9):543–556. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

Associated data