Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Aug;34(3):390-6.
doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fds012. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: the rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker

Rosemary Hiscock  1 , Linda Bauld, Amanda Amos, Stephen Platt
Affiliations

Smoking and socioeconomic status in England: the rise of the never smoker and the disadvantaged smoker

Rosemary Hiscock et al. J Public Health (Oxf). 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Since 2000 various tobacco control measures have been implemented in the UK. Changes in the smoking status of low and high socioeconomic status (SES) groups in England during this period (2001-08) are explored.

Methods: Secondary analysis of the Health Survey for England general population samples was undertaken. Over 88 000 adults, age 16 or over, living in England were included. Smoking status (current, ex or never) was reported. SES was assessed through a count of seven possible indicators of disadvantage: National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification (NSSEC), neighbourhood index of multiple deprivation, lone parenting, car availability, housing tenure, income and unemployment.

Results: Smoking rates were four times higher among the most disadvantaged [60.7% (95% CI: 58.2-63.3)] than the most affluent [15.3% (95% CI: 14.8-15.8)]. Smoking prevalence declined between 2001 and 2008 except among the multiply disadvantaged. This trend appeared to be due to an increase in never smoking rather than an increase in quitting. Disadvantage declined among non-smokers but not smokers.

Conclusions: In general never smoking and affluence increased in England over this period. The disadvantaged, however, did not experience the decline in smoking and smokers missed out from the increase in affluence. Smoking and disadvantage may increasingly coexist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of SES among smokers and non-smokers in 2001–03 and 2006–08.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organisation. Global Health Observatory (GHO): tobacco control. 2011. http://www.who.int/gho/tobacco/en/index.html. archived at http://www.webcitation.org/60Gi6P2Er . 7 March 2011, date last accessed.
    1. World Health Organisation. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2009: implementing smoke-free environments. 2009. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwhqlibdoc.who.int%2Fpu... . 18 July 2011, date last accessed.
    1. Twigg L, Moon G, Walker S. The Smoking Epidemic in England. Health Development Agency; 2004. http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fealingpct.harlequinliv... . 7 March 2011, date last accessed.
    1. Cavelaars AEJM, Kunst AE, Geurts JJM, et al. Educational differences in smoking: international comparison. BMJ. 2000;320:1102–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ONS. Smoking and drinking among adults, 2009: a report on the 2009 general lifestyle survey. 2011. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/ghs/general-lifestyle-survey/2009-report/i... . 23 December 2011, date last accessed.

Publication types