Update on the biological effects of ionizing radiation, relative dose factors and radiation hygiene
- PMID: 22376091
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2011.01665.x
Update on the biological effects of ionizing radiation, relative dose factors and radiation hygiene
Abstract
Diagnostic imaging is an indispensable part of contemporary medical and dental practice. Over the last few decades there has been a dramatic increase in the use of ionizing radiation for diagnostic imaging. The carcinogenic effects of high-dose exposure are well known. Does diagnostic radiation rarely cause cancer? We don't know but we should act as if it does. Accordingly, dentists should select patients wisely - only make radiographs when there is patient-specific reason to believe there is a reasonable expectation the radiograph will offer unique information influencing diagnosis or treatment. Low-dose examinations should be made: intraoral imaging - use fast film or digital sensors, thyroid collars, rectangular collimation; panoramic and lateral cephalometric imaging - use digital systems or rare-earth film screen combinations; and cone beam computed tomography - use low-dose machines, restrict field size to region of interest, reduce mA and length of exposure arc as appropriate.
© 2012 Australian Dental Association.
Similar articles
-
Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.Rofo. 2014 Aug;186(8):762-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366256. Epub 2014 Mar 19. Rofo. 2014. PMID: 24648236
-
Review article: radiation protection in dental radiology.Br J Radiol. 1994 Nov;67(803):1041-9. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-803-1041. Br J Radiol. 1994. PMID: 7820393 Review.
-
Assessment of the problem: pediatric doses in screen-film and digital radiography.Pediatr Radiol. 2004 Oct;34 Suppl 3:S173-82; discussion S234-41. doi: 10.1007/s00247-004-1267-8. Pediatr Radiol. 2004. PMID: 15558259 Review.
-
Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography.Curr Opin Dent. 1992 Jun;2:1-9. Curr Opin Dent. 1992. PMID: 1520917 Review.
-
Attitude of the Belgian dentist population towards radiation protection.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 Sep;33(5):334-9. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/22185511. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004. PMID: 15585812
Cited by
-
Use of Reference Ear Plug to improve accuracy of lateral cephalograms generated from cone-beam computed tomography scans.Korean J Orthod. 2013 Apr;43(2):54-61. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.54. Epub 2013 Apr 25. Korean J Orthod. 2013. PMID: 23671830 Free PMC article.
-
Revisiting dynamic range and image enhancement ability of contemporary digital radiographic systems-part 2: a subjective assessment.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Apr;52(4):20220370. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20220370. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36988093 Free PMC article.
-
Imaging of Radiation- and Medication-Related Osteonecrosis.Radiol Clin North Am. 2018 Jan;56(1):77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2017.08.006. Epub 2017 Oct 10. Radiol Clin North Am. 2018. PMID: 29157550 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence on radiation dose reduction using rectangular collimation: a systematic review.Int Dent J. 2019 Apr;69(2):84-97. doi: 10.1111/idj.12411. Epub 2018 Jun 29. Int Dent J. 2019. PMID: 29959778 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid patient-specific organ dose estimation in computed tomography scans via integration of radiomics features and neural networks.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):7379-7391. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-645. Epub 2024 Sep 26. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024. PMID: 39429608 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources