Prognostic factors for time to treatment failure and time to 12 months of remission for patients with focal epilepsy: post-hoc, subgroup analyses of data from the SANAD trial
- PMID: 22377180
- DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70018-2
Prognostic factors for time to treatment failure and time to 12 months of remission for patients with focal epilepsy: post-hoc, subgroup analyses of data from the SANAD trial
Abstract
Background: Epilepsy is a heterogeneous disorder, with outcomes ranging from immediate remission after taking a first antiepileptic drug to frequent unremitting seizures with multiple treatment failures. Few prognostic models enable prediction of outcome; we therefore aimed to use data from the SANAD study to predict outcome overall and for patients receiving specific treatments.
Methods: The SANAD study was a randomised controlled trial in which standard antiepileptic drugs were compared with new treatments. Arm A included patients for whom carbamazepine was considered the first-line treatment, most of whom were newly diagnosed with focal epilepsy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate. Outcomes were time to treatment failure overall, because of inadequate seizure control, and because of adverse events, and time to 12 months of remission from seizures. In this post-hoc study we used regression multivariable modelling to investigate how clinical factors affect the probability of treatment failure and the probability of achieving 12 months of remission.
Findings: For time to treatment failure, we identified several significant risk factors: sex (male vs female, hazard ratio [HR] 0·86, 95% CI 0·75-0·99), treatment history (taking non-SANAD antiepileptic drugs [other than those listed above] vs treatment naive, 1·27, 1·05-1·53), age (eg, older than 71 years vs 10 years or younger, 0·68, 0·51-0·91), total number of seizures (eg, four to 11 seizures vs two or fewer, 1·08, 1·05-1·11), electroencephalogram results (epileptiform abnormality vs normal, 1·26, 1·07-1·50), seizure type (eg, secondary generalised vs simple or complex partial only, 0·78, 0·66-0·91), site of onset (not localised vs temporal lobe, 1·25, 1·06-1·47), and treatment (lamotrigine vs carbamazepine, 0·76, 0·61-0·95). Significant factors for time to 12 months of remission were sex (male vs female, 1·19, 1·05-1·35), treatment history (taking a non-SANAD antiepileptic drug vs treatment naive, 0·64, 0·52-0·78), age (eg, older than 71 years vs 10 years or younger, 1·60, 1·26-2·03), time from first seizure (60-239 months vs ≥2 months, 1·14, 1·01-1·29; >240 months vs ≤2 months, 1·39, 1·04-1·86), neurological insult (present vs absent, 0·75, 0·61-0·93), total number of seizures before randomisation (eg, four to 11 vs two or fewer, 0·87, 0·85-0·90), and treatment (gabapentin vs carbamazepine, 0·71, 0·59-0·86; topiramate vs carbamazepine, 0·81, 0·68-0·98).
Interpretation: We present a thorough investigation of prognostic factors from a large randomised controlled trial in patients starting antiepileptic monotherapy. If validated, our models could aid in individual patient risk stratification and the design and analysis of epilepsy trials.
Funding: National Institute for Health Research (UK).
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
What does the future hold for patients with epilepsy?Lancet Neurol. 2012 Apr;11(4):298-300. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70041-8. Epub 2012 Feb 28. Lancet Neurol. 2012. PMID: 22377179 No abstract available.
-
New and old: notable drug developments for clinical practice.J Neurol. 2012 May;259(5):1003-5. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6518-2. J Neurol. 2012. PMID: 22527241 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
