Risk of serious toxicity in 1181 patients treated in phase I clinical trials of predominantly targeted anticancer drugs: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience
- PMID: 22377564
 - PMCID: PMC4092254
 - DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds027
 
Risk of serious toxicity in 1181 patients treated in phase I clinical trials of predominantly targeted anticancer drugs: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience
Abstract
Background: This study assessed toxicity in advanced cancer patients treated in a phase I clinic that focuses on targeted agents.
Patients and methods: An analysis of database records of 1181 consecutive patients with advanced cancer who were treated in the phase I program starting 1 January 2006 was carried out.
Results: All patients were treated on at least 1 of the 82 phase I clinical trials. Overall, 56 trials (68.3%) had only targeted agents, 13 (15.9%) only cytotoxics, and 13 (15.9%) targeted and cytotoxic agents. Rates of grade 3 and 4 toxicity that were at least possibly drug related were 7.1% and 3.2%, respectively, and 5 of the 1181 patients (0.4%) died from toxicity that was at least possibly drug related. The most common grade 3 or more toxic effects were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, dehydration, infection, altered mental status, bleeding, vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status greater than zero and use of a cytotoxic agent were selected as independent factors associated with serious toxicity.
Conclusion: Phase I trials of primarily targeted agents showed low rates of toxicity, with 10.3% of patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicity and a 0.4% rate of death, at least possibly drug related.
Figures
              
              
              
              
                
                
                Comment in
- 
  
  Learning from toxicity patterns in phase I trials during the era of mechanism targeted agents.Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):1934-1936. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds116. Epub 2012 Apr 17. Ann Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22510374 No abstract available.
 
References
- 
    
- American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures 2011. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2011.
 
 - 
    
- Horstmann E, McCabe MS, Grochow L, et al. Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, 1991 through 2002. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:895–904. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Kurzrock R, Benjamin RS. Risks and benefits of phase 1 oncology trials, revisited. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:930–932. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Itoh K, Sasaki Y, Miyata Y, et al. Therapeutic response and potential pitfalls in phase I clinical trials of anticancer agents conducted in Japan. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994;34:451–454. - PubMed
 
 - 
    
- Estey E, Hoth D, Simon R, et al. Therapeutic response in phase I trials of antineoplastic agents. Cancer Treat Rep. 1986;70:1105–1115. - PubMed
 
 
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
