The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome
- PMID: 22377629
- PMCID: PMC3338263
- DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.138073
The role of background selection in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation: evidence from variability on the Drosophila X chromosome
Abstract
In the putatively ancestral population of Drosophila melanogaster, the ratio of silent DNA sequence diversity for X-linked loci to that for autosomal loci is approximately one, instead of the expected "null" value of 3/4. One possible explanation is that background selection (the hitchhiking effect of deleterious mutations) is more effective on the autosomes than on the X chromosome, because of the lack of crossing over in male Drosophila. The expected effects of background selection on neutral variability at sites in the middle of an X chromosome or an autosomal arm were calculated for different models of chromosome organization and methods of approximation, using current estimates of the deleterious mutation rate and distributions of the fitness effects of deleterious mutations. The robustness of the results to different distributions of fitness effects, dominance coefficients, mutation rates, mapping functions, and chromosome size was investigated. The predicted ratio of X-linked to autosomal variability is relatively insensitive to these variables, except for the mutation rate and map length. Provided that the deleterious mutation rate per genome is sufficiently large, it seems likely that background selection can account for the observed X to autosome ratio of variability in the ancestral population of D. melanogaster. The fact that this ratio is much less than one in D. pseudoobscura is also consistent with the model's predictions, since this species has a high rate of crossing over. The results suggest that background selection may play a major role in shaping patterns of molecular evolution and variation.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The relation between recombination rate and patterns of molecular evolution and variation in Drosophila melanogaster.Mol Biol Evol. 2014 Apr;31(4):1010-28. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu056. Epub 2014 Jan 30. Mol Biol Evol. 2014. PMID: 24489114 Free PMC article.
-
Codon usage bias and effective population sizes on the X chromosome versus the autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster.Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):811-23. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mss222. Epub 2012 Nov 29. Mol Biol Evol. 2013. PMID: 23204387 Free PMC article.
-
Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster.Genet Res. 1996 Oct;68(2):131-49. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300034029. Genet Res. 1996. PMID: 8940902
-
Background selection 20 years on: the Wilhelmine E. Key 2012 invitational lecture.J Hered. 2013 Mar;104(2):161-71. doi: 10.1093/jhered/ess136. Epub 2013 Jan 8. J Hered. 2013. PMID: 23303522 Review.
-
The relations between recombination rate and patterns of molecular variation and evolution in Drosophila.Annu Rev Genet. 2014;48:383-403. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092525. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Annu Rev Genet. 2014. PMID: 25251853 Review.
Cited by
-
RAiSD detects positive selection based on multiple signatures of a selective sweep and SNP vectors.Commun Biol. 2018 Jun 27;1:79. doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0085-8. eCollection 2018. Commun Biol. 2018. PMID: 30271960 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the Factors That Shape Patterns of Nucleotide Diversity in the House Mouse Genome.Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Dec 1;35(12):2971-2988. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy188. Mol Biol Evol. 2018. PMID: 30295866 Free PMC article.
-
How Can We Resolve Lewontin's Paradox?Genome Biol Evol. 2022 Jul 2;14(7):evac096. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evac096. Genome Biol Evol. 2022. PMID: 35738021 Free PMC article.
-
A Comparison of Selective Pressures in Plant X-Linked and Autosomal Genes.Genes (Basel). 2018 May 3;9(5):234. doi: 10.3390/genes9050234. Genes (Basel). 2018. PMID: 29751495 Free PMC article.
-
Hemizygosity Enhances Purifying Selection: Lack of Fast-Z Evolution in Two Satyrine Butterflies.Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Oct 23;8(10):3108-3119. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw214. Genome Biol Evol. 2016. PMID: 27590089 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Andolfatto P., 2001. Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in African and non-African populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18: 279–290. - PubMed
-
- Aquadro C. F., Begun D. J., Kindahl E. C., 1994. Selection, recombination, and DNA polymorphism in Drosophila, 46–56 Non-neutral Evolution: Theories and Molecular Data, edited by Golding B. Chapman & Hall, London.
-
- Ashburner M., Golic K. G., Hawley R. S., 2005. Drosophila. A Laboratory Handbook. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
-
- Bachtrog D., 2008. Evidence for male-driven evolution in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25: 617–619. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases