Smokers' perceptions of smokeless tobacco and harm reduction
- PMID: 22377777
- DOI: 10.1057/jphp.2012.9
Smokers' perceptions of smokeless tobacco and harm reduction
Abstract
Existing survey data indicate that most smokers are not receptive to harm reduction incentives of switching to smokeless tobacco (SLT). Little is known about the underlying reasons for these views. To explore smokers' perceptions of SLT, we conducted a focus group (eight in total) study of daily smokers between 2009 and 2010 at the University of California, Irvine. We transcribed each 2-hour focus group verbatim and analyzed it using domain analysis. The discussions revealed several reasons why smokers are not receptive to SLT. First, smokers associated new spit-less SLT (that is, Snus) with historic images of chewing tobacco. Second, smokers viewed smoking as an incentive to take a break from their daily routine. Third, smokers expressed lack of control over nicotine delivery when using SLT, relative to cigarettes. These findings challenge tobacco manufacturers' strategies to market a smokeless alternative as a growing number of smoke-free policies are introduced.
Similar articles
-
Are smokers receptive to using smokeless tobacco as a substitute?Prev Med. 2009 Aug-Sep;49(2-3):229-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.012. Epub 2009 Jul 23. Prev Med. 2009. PMID: 19631684
-
Smokers' preferences for medicinal nicotine vs smokeless tobacco.Am J Health Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):462-72. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.5.462. Am J Health Behav. 2007. PMID: 17555377
-
Is snus the same as dip? Smokers' perceptions of new smokeless tobacco advertising.Tob Control. 2013 Mar;22(2):84-90. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050022. Epub 2011 Oct 4. Tob Control. 2013. PMID: 21972063 Free PMC article.
-
Smokeless tobacco: the epidemiology and politics of harm.Biomarkers. 2009 Jul;14 Suppl 1:79-84. doi: 10.1080/13547500902965476. Biomarkers. 2009. PMID: 19604065 Review.
-
Does dual use jeopardize the potential role of smokeless tobacco in harm reduction?Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Nov;12(11):1055-67. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq147. Epub 2010 Sep 16. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010. PMID: 20847148 Review.
Cited by
-
Do Emotions Spark Interest in Alternative Tobacco Products?Health Educ Behav. 2017 Aug;44(4):598-612. doi: 10.1177/1090198116683169. Epub 2017 Jan 10. Health Educ Behav. 2017. PMID: 28071144 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of harm from secondhand smoke exposure among U.S. adults, 2009-2010.Tob Induc Dis. 2016 Feb 2;14:3. doi: 10.1186/s12971-016-0069-8. eCollection 2016. Tob Induc Dis. 2016. PMID: 26839528 Free PMC article.
-
Measures of both perceived general and specific risks and benefits differentially predict adolescent and young adult tobacco and marijuana use: findings from a Prospective Cohort Study.Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2021;8(1):91. doi: 10.1057/s41599-021-00765-2. Epub 2021 Mar 29. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2021. PMID: 34435190 Free PMC article.
-
Risk perceptions of smokeless tobacco among adolescent and adult users and nonusers.J Health Commun. 2015;20(5):599-606. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1012237. Epub 2015 Apr 2. J Health Commun. 2015. PMID: 25832126 Free PMC article.
-
Smokers' perceptions of risks and harm from snus relative to cigarettes: A latent profile analysis study.Addict Behav. 2019 Apr;91:171-174. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 14. Addict Behav. 2019. PMID: 30501991 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical