EuroSCORE II
- PMID: 22378855
- DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs043
EuroSCORE II
Abstract
Objectives: To update the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) risk model.
Methods: A dedicated website collected prospective risk and outcome data on 22,381 consecutive patients undergoing major cardiac surgery in 154 hospitals in 43 countries over a 12-week period (May-July 2010). Completeness and accuracy were validated during data collection using mandatory field entry, error and range checks and after data collection using summary feedback confirmation by responsible officers and multiple logic checks. Information was obtained on existing EuroSCORE risk factors and additional factors proven to influence risk from research conducted since the original model. The primary outcome was mortality at the base hospital. Secondary outcomes were mortality at 30 and 90 days. The data set was divided into a developmental subset for logistic regression modelling and a validation subset for model testing. A logistic risk model (EuroSCORE II) was then constructed and tested.
Results: Compared with the original 1995 EuroSCORE database (in brackets), the mean age was up at 64.7 (62.5) with 31% females (28%). More patients had New York Heart Association class IV, extracardiac arteriopathy, renal and pulmonary dysfunction. Overall mortality was 3.9% (4.6%). When applied to the current data, the old risk models overpredicted mortality (actual: 3.9%; additive predicted: 5.8%; logistic predicted: 7.57%). EuroSCORE II was well calibrated on testing in the validation data subset of 5553 patients (actual mortality: 4.18%; predicted: 3.95%). Very good discrimination was maintained with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.8095.
Conclusions: Cardiac surgical mortality has significantly reduced in the last 15 years despite older and sicker patients. EuroSCORE II is better calibrated than the original model yet preserves powerful discrimination. It is proposed for the future assessment of cardiac surgical risk.
Comment in
-
How well calibrated is EuroSCORE II?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;43(1):208. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs349. Epub 2012 May 30. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 22648918 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Nezic et al.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;43(1):207. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs347. Epub 2012 Jun 22. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 22728227 No abstract available.
-
Calibration of the EuroSCORE II risk stratification model: is the Hosmer-Lemeshow test acceptable any more?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;43(1):206. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs346. Epub 2012 Jun 22. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 22728228 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Hickey and Bridgewater.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Jan;43(1):208-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs345. Epub 2012 Jun 22. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 22728229 No abstract available.
-
Calibration of EuroSCORE II.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Mar;43(3):654. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs496. Epub 2012 Oct 4. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23041551 No abstract available.
-
Design flaws in EuroSCORE II.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Apr;43(4):871. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs562. Epub 2012 Oct 25. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23100294 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Collins and Altman.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Apr;43(4):872. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs563. Epub 2012 Oct 29. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23111559 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
